From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Wed Aug 21 16:39:53 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9E643C32
for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:39:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:39:50 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7LFf0Z31721 for
<jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:41:00 +0100
Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78683F0F1; Wed, 21 Aug 2002
11:41:02 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
[172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55093EBEC
for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:40:46 -0400
(EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
id g7LFeiJ28666 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 21 Aug 2002
11:40:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7LFehY28662 for
<exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:40:43 -0400
Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com
(IDENT:XBDOhGwm5z/WDeruIOWlcdhCsV2xiUiV@jump-austin.vircio.com
[192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7LFQLl29740
for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:26:21 -0400
Received: (qmail 29336 invoked by uid 104); 21 Aug 2002 15:40:43 -0000
Received: from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with
qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4218. . Clean. Processed in 0.440114
secs); 21/08/2002 10:40:42
Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com ([10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender
<cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with
SMTP for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 21 Aug 2002 15:40:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 411 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2002 15:40:41 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com) ([127.0.0.1])
(envelope-sender <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03)
with SMTP for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 21 Aug 2002 15:40:41 -0000
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>, exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: Re: New Sequences Window
In-Reply-To: <1029943066.26919.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com>
References: <1029882468.3116.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com>
<9627.1029933001@munnari.OZ.AU>
<1029943066.26919.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com>
X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg
X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="==_Exmh_1141066573P";
micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1029944441.398.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com>
From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57
Reply-To: Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-1030376441.95dd45@DeepEddy.Com>
X-Loop: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@spamassassin.taint.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
<mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
<mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:40:39 -0500
--==_Exmh_1141066573P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:17:45 -0500
>
> Ouch...I'll get right on it.
>
> > From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
> > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:30:01 +0700
> >
> > can't read "flist(totalcount,unseen)": no such element in array
> > while executing
> > "if {$flist(totalcount,$mhProfile(unseen-sequence)) > 0} {
> > FlagInner spool iconspool labelup
> > } else {
> > FlagInner down icondown labeldown
> > }"
> > (procedure "Flag_MsgSeen" line 3)
Fixed in CVS.
> > Second, I've been used to having a key binding which was to Msg_MarkUnseen
> > which doesn't seem to exist any more, and I'm not sure what I should replace
> > that with. There's obviously a way as the "Sequences" menu does this.
> > The "Mark Unseen" menu entry in the message "More" menu is still wanting
> > that function as well...
{Msg_Mark unseen}
I'm not sure how I missed the need to fix this in app-defaults for "Mark
Unseen". I guess that'll be my next CVS fix.
> > | For those who have other sequences defined, the window will widen to
> > | display the other sequences.
> >
> > Any chance of having that lengthen instead? I like all my exmh stuff
> > in nice columns (fits the display better). That is, I use the detached
> > folder list, one column. The main exmh window takes up full screen,
> > top to bottom, but less than half the width, etc...
I thought about that. The first order approximation would be to just add
using pack .... -side top instead of pack ... -side left, however, since their
each a different width, it would look funny.
> > I have space for more sequences, in the "unseen" window, as long as they
> > remain once nice narrow window (best would be if the sequences could be
> > ordered by some preference, then ones which didn't fit would just fall
> > off the bottom, and not be shown).
> >
> > I'd also prefer it if that window had no unusual background colouring,
> > just one constant colour - I have been running the unseen window with
> > background black, on a root window that is all black, with no borders or
> > other decorations, but made "sticky" - the appearance is just like the
> > folders with unseen messages (and their counts) are written into the
> > root window (because it is sticky, this small display follows me around
> > and do I can see when new mail needs processing).
The background color in this window is the same as the background
color in the ftoc.
> > I also find that I tend to have a bunch of sequences that only ever occur
> > in one folder (some I had forgotten I ever created). So in addition to
> > the "sequences to always show" and "sequences to never show", a
> > preference to only show sequences that occur in more than one folder
> > would be useful, and then have the sequences that occor only in the
> > folder I'm visiting appear in the list when that folder is current.
> > This is just to keep the list size somewhat manageable while remaining
> > productive (I quite often use a sequence to remember a particular message
> > in a folder - the name is used only there, and only for one message,
> > it gives me a handle on the message which remains as the folder is
> > packed, sorted, etc).
hmmm, let me think about it.
> > I haven't updated my exmh for some time now, so I'm not sure if this
> > next one is new, or just new since 2.5, but the Sequences menu (on the
> > bar with New Flist Search ...) only contains "unseen" and "urgent".
> > It would be useful if it contained all of the sequences that the folder
> > happens to have defined. A "New sequence" entry would also be useful
> > (to mark the message with a sequence name that didn't previously exist,
> > which can be done now using "Search" and the pick interface, but is
> > clumsy that way)
The only sequences that are defined there are sequences which are defined in
app-defaults-color or ~/exmh/exmh-defaults-color. I've been thinking about
how to dynamically generate highlighting for other sequences, but haven't got
that figured out yet.
> > Actually, you once could, now when I try this, entering a sequence name
> > in the pick box, and a single message number, or a range N-N in the
> > list of messages, and no pick attributes at all, I now get ...
> >
> > syntax error in expression "int(1+1+(1 hit-1)*(3868-1-2)/(4878-1))"
> > while executing
> > "expr int($minlineno+1+($msgid-$minmsgid)*($maxlineno-$minlineno-2)/($max
> ms
> > gid-$minmsgid))"
> > (procedure "Ftoc_FindMsg" line 46)
> > invoked from within
> > "Ftoc_FindMsg $msg"
> > (procedure "Ftoc_FindMsgs" line 5)
> > invoked from within
> > "Ftoc_FindMsgs $msgids"
> > (procedure "Ftoc_PickMsgs" line 5)
> > invoked from within
> > "Ftoc_PickMsgs $pick(ids) $pick(addtosel)"
> > (procedure "PickInner" line 13)
> > invoked from within
> > "PickInner {exec pick +inbox -list} {4852 -sequence mercury}"
> > ("uplevel" body line 1)
> > invoked from within
> > "uplevel #0 $cmd"
> > (procedure "busyCursorInner" line 8)
> > invoked from within
> > "busyCursorInner $cmd $widgets"
> > (procedure "busyCursorHack" line 32)
> > invoked from within
> > "busyCursorHack $args"
> > ("cursor" arm line 1)
> > invoked from within
> > "switch $busy(style) {
> > icon {busyIcon $args}
> > cursorAll {busyCursor $args}
> > cursor {busyCursorHack $args}
> > default {eval $args}
> > }"
> > (procedure "busy" line 3)
> > invoked from within
> > "busy PickInner $cmd $msgs"
> > (procedure "Pick_It" line 51)
> > invoked from within
> > "Pick_It"
> > invoked from within
> > ".pick.but.pick invoke"
> > ("uplevel" body line 1)
> > invoked from within
> > "uplevel #0 [list $w invoke]"
> > (procedure "tkButtonUp" line 7)
> > invoked from within
> > "tkButtonUp .pick.but.pick
> > "
> > (command bound to event)
> >
> > It has been ages since I did this last though. I tried adding a Subject
> > to pick on (easy as I know what's in the message...) which made no differ
> en
> > ce.
> > Looks as if something is now saying "1 hit" when before it didn't, or
> > similar.
hmmm, that may or may not be my fault...I'll take a look at it.
> > | I've also changed the ftoc colorization as discussed briefly on the l
> is
> > t a
> > | week or so ago.
> >
> > Any chance of making the current message a little brighter background?
> > Just to make it stand out a fraction more than it does (maybe this is
> > more apparent to me than many, as I use very small fonts everywhere,
> > the background of the ftoc line isn't very wide).
I don't see any reason why not. Experiment and let me know what works for you.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500
World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.
--==_Exmh_1141066573P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000
iD8DBQE9Y7R3K9b4h5R0IUIRAvJfAJoDZLxM2iVMWeUGj9DG/oZrYYpsMACfZkY3
m1ILEOc5OmYxICv/ifINPxY=
=3Rdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1141066573P--
_______________________________________________
Exmh-workers mailing list
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers