From ilug-admin@linux.ie Mon Jul 29 11:27:57 2002
Return-Path: <ilug-admin@linux.ie>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A0D4414D
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 06:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:25:09 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6RGDIi07228 for
<jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 17:13:18 +0100
Received: from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21197; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 17:11:22 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: lugh.tuatha.org: Host root@localhost [127.0.0.1]
claimed to be lugh
Received: from mail05.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net
(mail05.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.21]) by lugh.tuatha.org
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA21160 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Sat,
27 Jul 2002 17:11:14 +0100
Received: (qmail 72507 messnum 660833 invoked from
network[159.134.255.227/unknown]); 27 Jul 2002 16:10:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pc) (159.134.255.227) by
mail05.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 72507) with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002
16:10:43 -0000
From: "John Moran" <arronax@eircom.net>
To: "ILUG" <ilug@linux.ie>
Subject: RE: [ILUG] Optimizing for Pentium Pt.2
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 17:10:39 +0100
Message-Id: <000001c23588$26d71750$e3ff869f@pc>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20020727015716.A6561@ie.suberic.net>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: ilug-admin@linux.ie
Errors-To: ilug-admin@linux.ie
X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Irish Linux Users' Group <ilug.linux.ie>
X-Beenthere: ilug@linux.ie
gcc, glibc and binutils, which the lfs site says not to optimise,
already determines what system you're compiling on, and optimises itself
to that. That's my understanding of how it works anyway.
John
Subject: Re: [ILUG] Optimizing for Pentium Pt.2
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:24:30PM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> A while ago I asked what other packages I should optomize for Pentium.
> One
> person answered GlibC. This got me thinking about GCC itself, so I
asked on
> another list and got a few answers, most were "don't even think about
it" but
> a few suggested GCC and one pointed me to Linux From Scratch.
why?
or more specifically, what do you mean? on one hand you can optimise
how gcc is compiled. all that will do is make it generate the exact
same code just a smidge faster. and since gcc is such a memory pig,
you'd do better to buy more ram to up your fs cache hits and to keep
gcc's heap out of swap.
on the other side you can look into patches to gcc that affect it's code
generation. um, ok, but keep in mind that compiler errors suck. i can't
express that enough. compilers should just work. perfectly. always.
doing anything that might affect that is, in my opinion, insane. they're
hard to trace and you'd better have a deep knowledge of what's going on
to either report bugs to the patch developers or to fix it yourself.
plus my understanding is that gcc would need major changes to get large
speed boosts on x86 chips.
kevin
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie