From ilug-admin@linux.ie Tue Aug 6 13:58:22 2002
Return-Path: <ilug-admin@linux.ie>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAA1441C4
for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 08:48:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 06 Aug 2002 13:48:39 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g76Cfrk28984 for
<jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:41:53 +0100
Received: from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29893; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:39:13 +0100
Received: from puma.dub0.ie.cp.net ([62.17.137.250]) by lugh.tuatha.org
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29864 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Tue,
6 Aug 2002 13:39:05 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: lugh.tuatha.org: Host [62.17.137.250] claimed to
be puma.dub0.ie.cp.net
Received: from AHOLM.elivefree.net (10.40.2.248) by puma.dub0.ie.cp.net
(6.7.009) id 3D4AB18800002158 for ilug@linux.ie; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:38:35
+0100
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20020806133046.026b8b88@mail.elivefree.net>
X-Sender: anders.holm@mail.elivefree.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 13:36:44 +0100
To: ilug@linux.ie, ilug@linux.ie
From: Anders Holm <anders.holm@elivefree.net>
Subject: Re: [ILUG] Sparc Solaris (was: Dell GX260 V Redhat 7.3)
In-Reply-To: <20020806123023.GQ14040@jinny.ie>
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20020806131829.03c2ae30@mail.elivefree.net>
<20020806125617.F17211@ie.suberic.net>
<653270E74A8DD31197AF009027AA4F8B01845F1B@LIMXMMF303>
<20020805224355.GB26632@csn.ul.ie>
<001501c23d25$c21ba0b0$3864a8c0@sabeo.ie>
<20020806125617.F17211@ie.suberic.net>
<5.1.1.6.0.20020806131829.03c2ae30@mail.elivefree.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: ilug-admin@linux.ie
Errors-To: ilug-admin@linux.ie
X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Irish Linux Users' Group <ilug.linux.ie>
X-Beenthere: ilug@linux.ie
At 13:30 06/08/2002, John P. Looney wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 01:22:07PM +0100, Anders Holm mentioned:
> > > Heh, how hard would it be to get a PC with an OpenBoot prom ?
> >
> > You could burn a PROM yourself, if you'd wish. I believe that the netboot
> > project would have a PROM you could download and burn, having the needed
> > h/w of course.. ;)
>
> But the PROMs are for specific network cards, and all their are really is
>a bootp/tftp client. Not the whole set of nice bits & pieces you get with
>an OpenBoot PROM.
True, but would still enable you to do a network install without using boot
floppies. Then again, boot floppies are cheaper, and easier to recreate
when you'd like to do some changes to it. Gets messier when you'd have a
boot image on a server, and the only way you can test it is to boot it over
the network. In any case, it's just one option available.
> AMD were talking of supporting it ages back, when the Athlon was looking
>like it would just be on workstations from day one. They seemed to drop
>it, and go for the crappy MSDOS compatible BIOS though.
Too bad they didn't go with that then. Would have been so much nicer than
the old MSDOS crap. I do like the OpenBoot idea actually. Especially being
able to set the PROM to boot from whatever disk slice you'd want. No need
to set that in lilo/grub any more in that case, since the OpenBoot rom
takes care of that part for you. Then again, you wouldn't get a menu that
allows you to choose what you want to boot. There's good and bad, all
depending on what you want to do, I suppose. Sitting here and typing I'm
realising that it is both a nice thing, and a nasty thing..
Ah well, life sucks as well, some say.. ;)
//Anders//
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie