From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Tue Aug 13 10:25:19 2002
Return-Path: <razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502774410C
for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:20:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:20:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
g7D3dab15774 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 04:39:37 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17eSRW-0002k1-00; Mon,
12 Aug 2002 20:34:02 -0700
Received: from adsl-67-116-61-34.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net ([67.116.61.34]
helo=rover.vipul.net) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim
3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17eSR0-0006gP-00 for
<razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:33:30 -0700
Received: (from vipul@localhost) by rover.vipul.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
g7D3XRV01298; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:33:27 -0700
From: Vipul Ved Prakash <mail@vipul.net>
To: "Craig R . Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>
Cc: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Re: What's wrong with the Razor servers now?
Message-Id: <20020812203326.A1211@rover.vipul.net>
Reply-To: mail@vipul.net
Mail-Followup-To: "Craig R . Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>,
razor-users@lists.sf.net
References: <aj6gbq$dt8$1@main.gmane.org>
<59556AF6-AE1A-11D6-A15F-00039396ECF2@deersoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <59556AF6-AE1A-11D6-A15F-00039396ECF2@deersoft.com>;
from craig@deersoft.com on Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:38:44AM -0700
X-Operating-System: Linux rover.vipul.net 2.4.18
X-Privacy: If possible, encrypt your reply. Key at http://vipul.net/
Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:razor-users-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
<mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <razor-users.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users>,
<mailto:razor-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=razor-users>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:33:26 -0700
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:33:26 -0700
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:38:44AM -0700, Craig R . Hughes wrote:
> This is, I think the biggest fallacy here. You don't have to
> block jack shit to get a high trust rating, you just have to
> confirm Razor's existing opinion on a large number of messages:
>
> if(check() == spam) then submit() else revoke()
>
> That algorithm boosts trust, but reduces the information in
> SpamNet by damping.
Again, this is not true. Only certain events (reports/revokes) for a spam
are rewarded and the algorithm for picking these up is based on many
different factors.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash | "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist | widely distributed."
http://vipul.net/ | -- William Gibson
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users