From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Aug 12 18:39:06 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8E744177
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:39:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:39:06 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7CHZub27187 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:35:56 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 119FD2940AE; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by xent.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 0C9402940A3 for <fork@xent.com>; Mon,
12 Aug 2002 10:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25047 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 17:34:32 -0000
Received: from dsl.206.191.151.102.evergo.net (HELO JMHALL)
(206.191.151.102) by mail.evergo.net with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 17:34:32 -0000
Reply-To: <johnhall@evergo.net>
From: "John Hall" <johnhall@evergo.net>
To: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
Subject: RE: David Friedman: Mail Me the Money!
Message-Id: <001901c24226$81994050$0200a8c0@JMHALL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <F27KoOxhSFIDDzpJUEk0000b8ae@hotmail.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:34:26 -0700
The case against theft also acknowledges that the value to the thief is
often far less than the value to the victim. Stealing my $1,000 sterio
and then fencing it for $50 does not result in 'no loss' the the economy
overall. For the same reason that voluntary transactions increase
social value, involuntary ones decrease it. If the sterio was worth as
much to the theif as it was to me he'd buy it ...
On the flip side of this, common law allows a breach of property law in
precisely the type of scenarios where a net social gain is recorded but
the owner's availability to make a contract was problematic. Breaking
into your isolated cabin because I'm starving, for example, is
permissible if I later offer restitution for the damage I caused and the
food I ate.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com] On Behalf Of
> Russell Turpin
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 6:25 AM
> To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
> Subject: Re: David Friedman: Mail Me the Money!
>
> R. A. Hettinga:
> >..which reminds me of my favorite David Friedman quote. "The direct
use
> of
> >physical force is so poor a solution to the problem of limited
resources
> >that it is commonly employed only by small children and great
nations."
>
> Is that relevent here? The spam problem, like
> the fraud and the robbery problem, is about people
> who will do whatever it takes to make a buck, no
> matter how much harm they do to others in the
> process.
>
> From an economist's viewpoint, the downside of
> theft is not that it transfers property from one
> person to another, which is no loss to the economy
> overall, but that defending against it is an
> additional expense simply to enjoy what you
> have already acquired.
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork