From fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Aug 13 10:31:13 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FD443C47
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:22:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:22:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7D6Nwb19825 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Tue, 13 Aug 2002 07:23:59 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 1E2F02940AC; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from alumnus.caltech.edu (alumnus.caltech.edu [131.215.49.51])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15B92940A8 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alumnus.caltech.edu
    (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7D6MKDI024833; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:22:21
    -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: NYTimes.com Article: Bigger Bar Code Inches Up on Retailers
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
Cc: gojomo@usa.net, fork@spamassassin.taint.org
To: Damien Morton <damien.morton@acm.org>
From: Rohit Khare <Rohit@KnowNow.com>
In-Reply-To: <000101c24285$d1c8da40$6a906c42@damien>
Message-Id: <08B81723-AE85-11D6-A682-000393A46DEA@KnowNow.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 23:22:25 -0700

Sure, the *object* of a particular head of lettuce may be unique, but 
we're not tracking lettuce heads -- we're tracking the *idea* of a 
lettuce head in a capitalist system, an ownership relation.

Besides, in the worst case, these damn object ID's aren't very 
compressible. Best representation of a unique head of lettuce I can 
think of is... that very head of lettuce.

Of course, an accumulator is much easier to write, since the Pauli 
Exclusion Principle guarantees that adding a head of lettuce to a bin is 
an _atomic operation_

:-)

Rohit



On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 09:56  PM, Damien Morton wrote:

>
> How about a highly error corrected atomic level 3D encoding scheme that
> relies on shape, colour and chemical make up to uniquely identify every
> object in the universe.
>
> Objects uniquely identify themselves - theres no need for barcodes.
>
>
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
>
---
My permanent email address is khare@alumni.caltech.edu

http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork