From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Aug 8 15:54:15 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216244118
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:03:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 08 Aug 2002 15:03:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
g78E2u211245 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:02:56 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17cnoc-0000VF-00; Thu,
08 Aug 2002 06:59:02 -0700
Received: from otis1-177561-dp.dhcp.fnal.gov ([131.225.95.152]) by
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
17cnnk-00022v-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 08 Aug 2002 06:58:08 -0700
Received: (from wellner@localhost) by otis1-177561-dp.dhcp.fnal.gov
(8.11.6/8.11.6) id g78Dw2u01868; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:58:02 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: otis1-177561-dp.dhcp.fnal.gov: wellner set
sender to spamassassin@objenv.com using -f
To: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <tony@svanstrom.com>
Cc: Justin Mason <yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org>,
"Craig R.Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>,
Christopher Crowley <ccrowley@tulane.edu>,
<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is this a violation of TRADEMARK?
References: <20020806183451.X54243-100000@moon.campus.luth.se>
X-Stock-Tip: PTN
X-Mbti: ESTJ
From: Rich Wellner <spamassassin@objenv.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020806183451.X54243-100000@moon.campus.luth.se>
("Tony L. Svanstrom"'s
message of
"Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:39:50 +0200 (CEST)")
Message-Id: <t2mfzxpv4eu.fsf@otis1-177561-dp.dhcp.fnal.gov>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley,
i386-redhat-linux)
Organization: Spam For All
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 08:58:01 -0500
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 08:58:01 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by dogma.slashnull.org
id g78E2u211245
"Tony L. Svanstrom" <tony@svanstrom.com> writes:
> IMHO it's wrong that any company is allowed to use the name of a public
> project commercially, while others aren't´; esp. when it's a name that tells
> Average Joe that that version is so much better than the free one.
Dude, take that one up with Redhat, Suse, IBM or any of the other folks using
the name of a public project (i.e. Linux) for a commercial product. ;-)
This is not only a concept with precedent it's actually quite common.
rw2
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk