From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Fri Aug 9 15:43:46 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC53844111
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:35:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:35:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79EMjb06586 for
<jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:22:45 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA03578 for
<jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 06:00:05 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17d1pg-0002bz-00; Thu,
08 Aug 2002 21:57:04 -0700
Received: from [216.40.247.31] (helo=host.yrex.com) by
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
17d1pP-0005rc-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 08 Aug 2002 21:56:47 -0700
Received: (qmail 17893 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2002 04:56:44 -0000
Received: from mgm.dsl.xmission.com (HELO opus) (204.228.152.186) by
216.40.247.31 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2002 04:56:44 -0000
From: "Michael Moncur" <mgm@starlingtech.com>
To: <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] How'd this one slip through?
Message-Id: <NEBBKLEDELIODOCJHLPCMEJMMOAA.mgm@starlingtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <D79A56AD131896448D0860DEE07CBE1FE155@med-core07.med.wayne.edu>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:56:37 -0600
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 22:56:37 -0600
> Ouch ;-) Although I'm not ready to give up razor just yet, I'd like to
> see a pyzor check in SA. I don't think it even needs to be written in
> perl. SA is actually calling razor-check and razor-report as well as
> dccproc for those checks so it should be nothing more than duplication
> of coding to add pyzor.
I don't know from Pyzor, but I've always thought that the way services like
Razor and DCC could be truly useful is if there were a bunch of different
ones. We can assign them scores based on how trustworthy each one is, and
when a message is listed in multiple services you can pretty much trust that
it's spam.
--
Michael Moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
"Mustard's no good without roast beef." --Chico Marx
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk