NAME
Moose::Cookbook::Basics::Recipe9 - Builder methods and lazy_build
SYNOPSIS
package BinaryTree;
use Moose;
has 'node' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Any');
has 'parent' => (
is => 'rw',
isa => 'BinaryTree',
predicate => 'has_parent',
weak_ref => 1,
);
has 'left' => (
is => 'rw',
isa => 'BinaryTree',
predicate => 'has_left',
lazy => 1,
builder => '_build_child_tree',
);
has 'right' => (
is => 'rw',
isa => 'BinaryTree',
predicate => 'has_right',
lazy => 1,
builder => '_build_child_tree',
);
before 'right', 'left' => sub {
my ($self, $tree) = @_;
$tree->parent($self) if defined $tree;
};
sub _build_child_tree {
my $self = shift;
return BinaryTree->new( parent => $self );
}
DESCRIPTION
If you've already read Moose::Cookbook::Basics::Recipe3, then this example should look awfully familiar. In fact, all we've done here is replace the attribute default
with a builder
method.
In this particular case, the default
and builder
options act in exactly the same way. When the left
or right
attribute get method is called, Moose will call the builder method to initialize the attribute.
Note that Moose calls the builder method on the object which has the attribute. Here's an example in code:
my $tree = BinaryTree->new();
my $left = $tree->left();
At this point, Moose will call $tree->_build_child_tree()
in order to populate the left
attribute. If we had passed left
to the original constructor, the builer would not be called.
Subclassable
There are some differences between default
and builder
. Because builder
is called by name, it goes through Perl's normal inheritance system. This means that builder methods are both inheritable and overrideable.
For example, we might make a BinaryTree
subclass:
package TrinaryTree;
use Moose;
extends 'BinaryTree';
has 'middle' => (
is => 'rw',
isa => 'BinaryTree',
predicate => 'has_middle',
lazy => 1,
builder => '_build_child_tree',
);
This doesn't quite work though. If you look closely at the _build_child_tree
method defined in BinaryTree
, you'll notice that it hard-codes a class name. Naughty us!
Also, as a bonus, we'll pass @_
through, so subclasses can override the method to pass additional options to the constructor.
Good object-oriented code should allow itself to be subclassed gracefully. Let's tweak _build_child_tree
:
sub _build_child_tree {
my $self = shift;
return (ref $self)->new( parent => $self, @_ );
}
Now _build_child_tree
can be gracefully inherited and overridden.
Composable
There's more to builders than just subclassing, though. The fact that builders are called by name also makes them suitable for use in a role.
package HasAnimal;
use Moose::Role;
requires '_build_animal';
has 'animal' => (
is => 'ro',
isa => 'Animal',
lazy => 1,
builder => '_build_animal',
);
This role provides an animal attribute, but requires that the consumer of the role provide a builder method it.
package CatLover;
use Moose;
with 'HasAnimal';
sub _build_animal {
return Cat->new();
}
The lazy_build shortcut
The lazy_build
attribute parameter can be used as sugar to specify a whole bunch of options at once.
has 'animal' => (
is => 'ro',
isa => 'Animal',
lazy_build => 1,
);
This is a shorthand for this:
has 'animal' => (
is => 'ro',
isa => 'Animal',
required => 1,
lazy => 1,
builder => '_build_animal',
predicate => 'has_animal',
clearer => 'clear_animal',
);
If your attribute starts with an underscore, Moose is smart and will do the right thing with the predicate
and clearer
, making them both start with an underscore. The builder
method always starts with an underscore, since you will want this to be private the vast majority of the time.
Note that the builder
method name is created by simply taking "_build_" and appending the attribute name. This means that attributes with a leading underscore like _animal
end up with a builder named _build__animal
.
CONCLUSION
The builder
option is a more OO-friendly version of the default
functionality. It also has the property of separating out the code into a separate well-defined method. This alone makes it valuable. It is quite ugly to jam a long default code reference into your attribute definition.
Here are some good rules for determining when to use builder
vs default
.
If the default value is a simple scalar that only needs to be calculated once (or a constant), use default
.
If the default value is an empty reference that needs to be wrapped in a coderef like sub { [] }
, use default
.
Otherwise, use builder
.
This ensures that your classes are easily subclassable, and also helps keep crufty code out of your attribute definition blocks.
AUTHOR
Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
Copyright 2006-2008 by Infinity Interactive, Inc.
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.