From ilug-admin@linux.ie Fri Jul 19 20:58:00 2002
Return-Path: <ilug-admin@linux.ie>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EED2440C8
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:58:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dogma.slashnull.org [212.17.35.15]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:58:00 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6JJvSJ30546 for
<jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:57:28 +0100
Received: from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28485; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:48:47 +0100
Received: from claymore.diva.ie (diva.ie [195.218.115.17] (may be forged))
by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28456 for
<ilug@linux.ie>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:48:41 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: lugh.tuatha.org: Host diva.ie [195.218.115.17]
(may be forged) claimed to be claymore.diva.ie
Received: from localhost (claymore [195.218.115.17]) by claymore.diva.ie
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24846 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Fri,
19 Jul 2002 20:48:40 +0100
Received: from 194.125.134.71 ( [194.125.134.71]) as user
rcunniff@mail.boxhost.net by webmail.gameshrine.com with HTTP;
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:48:40 +0100
Message-Id: <1027108120.3d386d180910a@webmail.gameshrine.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:48:40 +0100
From: Ronan Cunniffe <ronan@cunniffe.net>
To: ilug@linux.ie
Subject: Re: [ILUG] How to copy some files
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0
X-Originating-Ip: 194.125.134.71
Sender: ilug-admin@linux.ie
Errors-To: ilug-admin@linux.ie
X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Irish Linux Users' Group <ilug.linux.ie>
X-Beenthere: ilug@linux.ie
Quoting Ronan Waide <waider@waider.ie>:
> Sure, but soft links would do the same. To be honest, I'm trying to
> think of a useful use of hard links right now, and I'm a little
> stumped. There's gotta be some benefit that I'm missing that's
> immediately obvious to everyone.
Using Niall's example - single set of files but >1 namespace, and suppose that
you want to delete some items from the set according to rules applied to the
namespaces. With soft links you need an *extra* namespace the others refer to,
and after filtering the namespaces, you have to do a manual reference count to
decide what goes and what stays. With hard links, you just unlink and deletion
is automatic.
Ronan.
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie