From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Mon Jul 29 11:28:22 2002
Return-Path: <ilug-admin@linux.ie>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EA444156
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 06:25:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:25:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6T46ii09906 for
    <jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:06:44 +0100
Received: from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA16146; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:04:36 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: lugh.tuatha.org: Host root@localhost [127.0.0.1]
    claimed to be lugh
Received: from escargot.esatclear.ie (escargot.esatclear.ie
    [194.145.128.30]) by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA16111
    for <ilug@linux.ie>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:04:26 +0100
Received: from esatclear.ie (d-airlock032.esatclear.ie [194.145.133.32])
    by escargot.esatclear.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA14188 for
    <ilug@linux.ie>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:04:25 +0100
Message-Id: <3D44BE4F.8070603@esatclear.ie>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 05:02:23 +0100
From: Paul Kelly <longword@esatclear.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020725
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ilug@linux.ie
Subject: Re: [ILUG] Optimizing for Pentium Pt.2
References: <200207262228.XAA19581@lugh.tuatha.org>
    <20020727015716.A6561@ie.suberic.net>
    <200207271701.SAA23172@lugh.tuatha.org> <3D4359EE.9050405@esatclear.ie>
    <002a01c23664$b7326d40$f264a8c0@sabeo.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ilug-admin@linux.ie
Errors-To: ilug-admin@linux.ie
X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Irish Linux Users' Group <ilug.linux.ie>
X-Beenthere: ilug@linux.ie

Matthew French wrote:
>>Happiness was restored to the world with gcc 2.95 and later.
> I do not have the time to follow the compiler "wars", but I notice that I
> must use egcs to build 64 bit SPARC code.

2.95 was where the reintegration effort started and work on the other 
projects fell away. 3.0 was the target for completion of that work.

> GCC 3 should do it, but because it is so "buggy"[1] it is not worth trying
> to use unless you really want to track down those compiler errors... :(

A lot of those problems seem to have been shaken out by Redhat's ballsy 
gcc 2.96 stunt. I've been trying out RedHat Limbo for a few weeks now, 
equipped with gcc 3.1. I haven't fallen foul of compiler issue so far, 
that I'm aware of anyhow. That said I'm glad I don't do much C++ - seems 
pretty much every version of gcc (2.95, 2.96, 3.0, 3.1, and the 
forthcoming 3.2) breaks C++ binary compatibility in some way or other.

Paul.


-- 
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie