NAME
Text::BibTeX::Structure - provides base classes for user structure modules
SYNOPSIS
# Define a 'Foo' structure for BibTeX databases: first, the
# structure class:
package Text::BibTeX::FooStructure;
@ISA = ('Text::BibTeX::Structure');
sub known_option
{
my ($self, $option) = @_;
...
}
sub default_option
{
my ($self, $option) = @_;
...
}
sub describe_entry
{
my $self = shift;
$self->set_fields ($type,
\@required_fields,
\@optional_fields,
[$constraint_1, $constraint_2, ...]);
...
}
# Now, the structured entry class
package Text::BibTeX::FooEntry;
@ISA = ('Text::BibTeX::StructuredEntry');
# define whatever methods you like
DESCRIPTION
The module Text::BibTeX::Structure
provides two classes that form the basis of the btOOL "structure module" system. This system is how database structures are defined and imposed on BibTeX files, and provides an elegant synthesis of object-oriented techniques with BibTeX-style database structures. Nothing described here is particularly deep or subtle; anyone familar with object-oriented programming should be able to follow it. However, a fair bit of jargon in invented and tossed around, so pay attention.
A database structure, in btOOL parlance, is just a set of allowed entry types and the rules for fields in each of those entry types. Currently, there are three kinds of rules that apply to fields: some fields are required, meaning they must be present in every entry for a given type; some are optional, meaning they may be present, and will be used if they are; other fields are members of constraint sets, which are explained in "Field lists and constraint sets" below.
A btOOL structure is implemented with two classes: the structure class and the structured entry class. The former defines everything that applies to the structure as a whole (allowed types and field rules). The latter provides methods that operate on individual entries which conform (or are supposed to conform) to the structure. The two classes provided by the Text::BibTeX::Structure
module are Text::BibTeX::Structure
and Text::BibTeX::StructuredEntry
; these serve as base classes for, respectively, all structure classes and all structured entry classes. One canonical structure is provided as an example with btOOL: the Bib
structure, which (via the BibStructure
and BibEntry
classes) provides the same functionality as the standard style files of BibTeX 0.99. It is hoped that other programmers will write new bibliography-related structures, possibly deriving from the Bib
structure, to emulate some of the functionality that is available through third-party BibTeX style files.
The purpose of this manual page is to describe the whole "structure module" system. It is mainly for programmers wishing to implement a new database structure for data files with BibTeX syntax; if you are interested in the particular rules for the BibTeX-emulating Bib
structure, see Text::BibTeX::Bib.
Please note that the Text::BibTeX
prefix is dropped from most module and class names in this manual page, except where necessary.
STRUCTURE CLASSES
Structure classes have two roles: to define the list of allowed types and field rules, and to handle structure options.
Field lists and constraint sets
Field lists and constraint sets define the database structure for a particular entry type: that is, they specify the rules which an entry must follow to conform to the structure (assuming that entry is of an allowed type). There are three components to the field rules for each entry type: a list of required fields, a list of optional fields, and field constraints. Required and optional fields should be obvious to anyone with BibTeX experience: all required fields must be present, and any optional fields that are present have some meaning to the structure. (One could conceive of a "strict" interpretation, where any field not mentioned in the official definition is disallowed; this would be contrary to the open spirit of BibTeX databases, but could be useful in certain applications where a stricter level of control is desired. Currently, btOOL does not offer such an option.)
Field constraints capture the "one or the other, but not both" type of relationships present for some entry types in the BibTeX standard style files. Most BibTeX documentation glosses over the distinction between mutually constrained fields and required/optional fields. For instance, one of the standard entry types is book
, and "author
or editor
" is given in the list of required fields for that type. The meaning of this is that an entry of type book
must have either the author
or editor
fields, but not both. Likewise, the "volume
or number
" are listed under the "optional fields" heading for book
entries; it would be more accurate to say that every book
entry may have one or the other, or neither, of volume
or number
---but not both.
btOOL attempts to clarify this situation by creating a third category of fields, those that are mutually constrained. For instance, neither author
nor editor
appears in the list of required fields for the inbook
type according to btOOL; rather, a field constraint is created to express this relationship:
[1, 1, ['author', 'editor']]
That is, a field constraint is a reference to a three-element list. The last element is a reference to the constraint set, the list of fields to which the constraint applies. (Calling this a set is a bit inaccurate, as there are conditions in which the order of fields matters---see the check_field_constraints
method in "METHODS 2: BASE STRUCTURED ENTRY CLASS".) The first two elements are the minimum and maximum number of fields from the constraint set that must be present for an entry to conform to the constraint. This constraint thus expresses that there must be exactly one (>= 1 and <= 1) of the fields author
and editor
in a book
entry.
The "either one or neither, but not both" constraint that applies to the volume
and number
fields for book
entries is expressed slightly differently:
[0, 1, ['volume', 'number']]
That is, either 0 or 1, but not the full 2, of volume
and number
may be present.
It is important to note that checking and enforcing field constraints is based purely on counting which fields from a set are actually present; this mechanism can't capture "x must be present if y is" relationships.
The requirements imposed on the actual structure class are simple: it must provide a method describe_entry
which sets up a fancy data structure describing the allowed entry types and all the field rules for those types. The Structure
class provides methods (inherited by a particular structure class) to help particular structure classes create this data structure in a consistent, controlled way. For instance, the describe_structure
method in the BibTeX 0.99-emulating BibStructure
class is quite simple:
sub describe_entry
{
my $self = shift;
# series of 13 calls to $self->set_fields (one for each standard
# entry type)
}
One of those calls to the set_fields
method defines the rules for book
entries:
$self->set_fields ('book',
[qw(title publisher year)],
[qw(series address edition month note)],
[1, 1, [qw(author editor)]],
[0, 1, [qw(volume number)]]);
The first field list is the list of required fields, and the second is the list of optional fields. Any number of field constraints may follow the list of optional fields; in this case, there are two, one for each of the constraints (author
/editor
and volume
/number
) described above. At no point is a list of allowed types explicitly supplied; rather, each call to set_fields
adds one more allowed type.
New structure modules that derive from existing ones will probably use the add_fields
method (and possibly add_constraints
) to augment an existing entry type. Adding new types should be done with set_fields
, though.
Structure options
The other responsibility of structure classes is to handle structure options. These are scalar values that let the user customize the behaviour of both the structure class and the structured entry class. For instance, one could have an option to enable "extended structure", which might add on a bunch of new entry types and new fields. (In this case, the describe_entry
method would have to pay attention to this option and modify its behaviour accordingly.) Or, one could have options to control how the structured entry class sorts or formats entries (for bibliography structures such as Bib
).
The easy way to handle structure options is to provide two methods, known_option
and default_option
. These return, respectively, whether a given option is supported, and what its default value is. (If your structure doesn't support any options, you can just inherit these methods from the Structure
class. The default known_option
returns false for all options, and its companion default_option
crashes with an "unknown option" error.)
Once known_option
and default_option
are provided, the structure class can sit back and inherit the more visible set_options
and get_options
methods from the Structure
class. These are the methods actually used to modify/query options, and will be used by application programs to customize the structure module's behaviour, and by the structure module itself to pay attention to the user's wishes.
Options should generally have pure string values, so that the generic set_options method doesn't have to parse user-supplied strings into some complicated structure. However, set_options
will take any scalar value, so if the structure module clearly documents its requirements, the application program could supply a structure that meets its needs. Keep in mind that this requires cooperation between the application and the structure module; the intermediary code in Text::BibTeX::Structure
knows nothing about the format or syntax of your structure's options, and whatever scalar the application passes via set_options
will be stored for your module to retrieve via get_options
.
As an example, the Bib
structure supports a number of "markup" options that allow applications to control the markup language used for formatting bibliographic entries. These options are naturally paired, as formatting commands in markup languages generally have to be turned on and off. The Bib
structure thus expects references to two-element lists for markup options; to specify LaTeX 2e-style emphasis for book titles, an application such as btformat
would set the btitle_mkup
option as follows:
$structure->set_options (btitle_mkup => ['\emph{', '}']);
Other options for other structures might have a more complicated structure, but it's up to the structure class to document and enforce this.
STRUCTURED ENTRY CLASSES
A structured entry class defines the behaviour of individual entries under the regime of a particular database structure. This is the raison d'être for any database structure: the structure class merely lays out the rules for entries to conform to the structure, but the structured entry class provides the methods that actually operate on individual entries. Because this is completely open-ended, the requirements of a structured entry class are much less rigid than for a structure class. In fact, all of the requirements of a structured entry class can be met simply by inheriting from Text::BibTeX::StructuredEntry
, the other class provided by the Text::BibTeX::Structure
module. (For the record, those requirements are: a structured entry class must provide the entry parse/query/manipulate methods of the Entry
class, and it must provide the check
, coerce
, and silently_coerce
methods of the StructuredEntry
class. Since StructuredEntry
inherits from Entry
, both of these requirements are met "for free" by structured entry classes that inherit from Text::BibTeX::StructuredEntry
, so naturally this is the recommended course of action!)
There are deliberately no other methods required of structured entry classes. A particular application (eg. btformat
for bibliography structures) will require certain methods, but it's up to the application and the structure module to work out the requirements through documentation.
CLASS INTERACTIONS
Imposing a database structure on your entries sets off a chain reaction of interactions between various classes in the Text::BibTeX
library that should be transparent when all goes well. It could prove confusing if things go wrong and you have to go wading through several levels of application program, core Text::BibTeX
classes, and some structure module.
The justification for this complicated behaviour is that it allows you to write programs that will use a particular structured module without knowing the name of the structure when you write the program. Thus, the user can supply a database structure, and ultimately the entry objects you manipulate will be blessed into a class supplied by the structure module. A short example will illustrate this.
Typically, a Text::BibTeX
-based program is based around a kernel of code like this:
$bibfile = Text::BibTeX::File->new("foo.bib");
while ($entry = Text::BibTeX::Entry->new($bibfile))
{
# process $entry
}
In this case, nothing fancy is happening behind the scenes: the $bibfile
object is blessed into the Text::BibTeX::File
class, and $entry
is blessed into Text::BibTeX::Entry
. This is the conventional behaviour of Perl classes, but it is not the only possible behaviour. Let us now suppose that $bibfile
is expected to conform to a database structure specified by $structure
(presumably a user-supplied value, and thus unknown at compile-time):
$bibfile = Text::BibTeX::File->new("foo.bib");
$bibfile->set_structure ($structure);
while ($entry = Text::BibTeX::Entry->new($bibfile))
{
# process $entry
}
A lot happens behind the scenes with the call to $bibfile
's set_structure
method. First, a new structure object is created from $structure
. The structure name implies the name of a Perl module---the structure module---which is require
'd by the Structure
constructor. (The main consequence of this is that any compile-time errors in your structure module will not be revealed until a Text::BibTeX::File::set_structure
or Text::BibTeX::Structure::new
call attempts to load it.)
Recall that the first responsibility of a structure module is to define a structure class. The "structure object" created by the set_structure
method call is actually an object of this class; this is the first bit of trickery---the structure object (buried behind the scenes) is blessed into a class whose name is not known until run-time.
Now, the behaviour of the Text::BibTeX::Entry::new
constructor changes subtly: rather than returning an object blessed into the Text::BibTeX::Entry
class as you might expect from the code, the object is blessed into the structured entry class associated with $structure
.
For example, if the value of $structure
is "Foo"
, that means the user has supplied a module implementing the Foo
structure. (Ordinarily, this module would be called Text::BibTeX::Foo
---but you can customize this.) Calling the set_structure
method on $bibfile
will attempt to create a new structure object via the Text::BibTeX::Structure
constructor, which loads the structure module Text::BibTeX::Foo
. Once this module is successfully loaded, the new object is blessed into its structure class, which will presumably be called Text::BibTeX::FooStructure
(again, this is customizable). The new object is supplied with the user's structure options via the set_options
method (usually inherited), and then it is asked to describe the actual entry layout by calling its describe_entry
method. This, in turn, will usually call the inherited set_fields
method for each entry type in the database structure. When the Structure
constructor is finished, the new structure object is stored in the File
object (remember, we started all this by calling set_structure
on a File
object) for future reference.
Then, when a new Entry
object is created and parsed from that particular File
object, some more trickery happens. Trivially, the structure object stored in the File
object is also stored in the Entry
object. (The idea is that entries could belong to a database structure independently of any file, but usually they will just get the structure that was assigned to their database file.) More importantly, the new Entry
object is re-blessed into the structured entry class supplied by the structure module---presumably, in this case, Text::BibTeX::FooEntry
(also customizable).
Once all this sleight-of-hand is accomplished, the application may treat its entry objects as objects of the structured entry class for the Foo
structure---they may call the check/coerce methods inherited from Text::BibTeX::StructuredEntry
, and they may also call any methods specific to entries for this particular database structure. What these methods might be is up to the structure implementor to decide and document; thus, applications may be specific to one particular database structure, or they may work on all structures that supply certain methods. The choice is up to the application developer, and the range of options open to him depends on which methods structure implementors provide.
EXAMPLE
For example code, please refer to the source of the Bib
module and the btcheck
, btsort
, and btformat
applications supplied with Text::BibTeX
.
METHODS 1: BASE STRUCTURE CLASS
The first class provided by the Text::BibTeX::Structure
module is Text::BibTeX::Structure
. This class is intended to provide methods that will be inherited by user-supplied structure classes; such classes should not override any of the methods described here (except known_option
and default_option
) without very good reason. Furthermore, overriding the new
method would be useless, because in general applications won't know the name of your structure class---they can only call Text::BibTeX::Structure::new
(usually via Text::BibTeX::File::set_structure
).
Finally, there are three methods that structure classes should implement: known_option
, default_option
, and describe_entry
. The first two are described in "Structure options" above, the latter in "Field lists and constraint sets". Note that describe_entry
depends heavily on the set_fields
, add_fields
, and add_constraints
methods described here.
Constructor/simple query methods
- new (STRUCTURE, [OPTION => VALUE, ...])
-
Constructs a new structure object---not a
Text::BibTeX::Structure
object, but rather an object blessed into the structure class associated with STRUCTURE. More precisely:Loads (with
require
) the module implementing STRUCTURE. In the absence of other information, the module name is derived by appending STRUCTURE to"Text::BibTeX::"
---thus, the moduleText::BibTeX::Bib
implements theBib
structure. Use the pseudo-optionmodule
to override this module name. For instance, if the structureFoo
is implemented by the moduleFoo
:$structure = Text::BibTeX::Structure->new ('Foo', module => 'Foo');
This method
die
s if there are any errors loading/compiling the structure module.Verifies that the structure module provides a structure class and a structured entry class. The structure class is named by appending
"Structure"
to the name of the module, and the structured entry class by appending"Entry"
. Thus, in the absence of amodule
option, these two classes (for theBib
structure) would be namedText::BibTeX::BibStructure
andText::BibTeX::BibEntry
. Either or both of the default class names may be overridden by having the structure module return a reference to a hash (as opposed to the traditional1
returned by modules). This hash could then supply astructure_class
element to name the structure class, and anentry_class
element to name the structured entry class.Apart from ensuring that the two classes actually exist,
new
verifies that they inherit correctly (fromText::BibTeX::Structure
andText::BibTeX::StructuredEntry
respectively), and that the structure class provides the requiredknown_option
,default_option
, anddescribe_entry
methods.Creates the new structure object, and blesses it into the structure class. Supplies it with options by passing all (OPTION, VALUE) pairs to its
set_options
method. Calls itsdescribe_entry
method, which should list the field requirements for all entry types recognized by this structure.describe_entry
will most likely use some or all of theset_fields
,add_fields
, andadd_constraints
methods---described below---for this.
- name ()
-
Returns the name of the structure described by the object.
- entry_class ()
-
Returns the name of the structured entry class associated with this structure.
Field structure description methods
- add_constraints (TYPE, CONSTRAINT, ...)
-
Adds one or more field constraints to the structure. A field constraint is specified as a reference to a three-element list; the last element is a reference to the list of fields affected, and the first two elements are the minimum and maximum number of fields from the constraint set allowed in an entry of type TYPE. See "Field lists and constraint sets" for a full explanation of field constraints.
- add_fields (TYPE, REQUIRED [, OPTIONAL [, CONSTRAINT, ...]])
-
Adds fields to the required/optional lists for entries of type TYPE. Can also add field constraints, but you can just as easily use
add_constraints
for that.REQUIRED and OPTIONAL, if defined, should be references to lists of fields to add to the respective field lists. The CONSTRAINTs, if given, are exactly as described for
add_constraints
above. - set_fields (TYPE, REQUIRED [, OPTIONAL [, CONSTRAINTS, ...]])
-
Sets the lists of required/optional fields for entries of type TYPE. Identical to
add_fields
, except that the field lists and list of constraints are set from scratch here, rather than being added to.
Field structure query methods
- types ()
-
Returns the list of entry types supported by the structure.
- known_type (TYPE)
-
Returns true if TYPE is a supported entry type.
- known_field (TYPE, FIELD)
-
Returns true if FIELD is in the required list, optional list, or one of the constraint sets for entries of type TYPE.
- required_fields (TYPE)
-
Returns the list of required fields for entries of type TYPE.
- optional_fields ()
-
Returns the list of optional fields for entries of type TYPE.
- field_constraints ()
-
Returns the list of field constraints (in the format supplied to
add_constraints
) for entries of type TYPE.
Option methods
- known_option (OPTION)
-
Returns false. This is mainly for the use of derived structures that don't have any options, and thus don't need to provide their own
known_option
method. Structures that actually offer options should override this method; it should return true if OPTION is a supported option. - default_option (OPTION)
-
Crashes with an "unknown option" message. Again, this is mainly for use by derived structure classes that don't actually offer any options. Structures that handle options should override this method; every option handled by
known_option
should have a default value (which might just beundef
) that is returned bydefault_option
. Yourdefault_options
method should crash on an unknown option, perhaps by callingSUPER::default_option
(in order to ensure consistent error messages). For example:sub default_option { my ($self, $option) = @_; return $default_options{$option} if exists $default_options{$option}; $self->SUPER::default_option ($option); # crash }
The default value for an option is returned by
get_options
when that options has not been explicitly set withset_options
. - set_options (OPTION => VALUE, ...)
-
Sets one or more option values. (You can supply as many
OPTION => VALUE
pairs as you like, just so long as there are an even number of arguments.) Each OPTION must be handled by the structure module (as indicated by theknown_option
method); if notset_options
willcroak
. Each VALUE may be any scalar value; it's up to the structure module to validate them. - get_options (OPTION, ...)
-
Returns the value(s) of one or more options. Any OPTION that has not been set by
set_options
will return its default value, fetched using thedefault_value
method. If OPTION is not supported by the structure module, then your program either already crashed (when it tried to set it withset_option
), or it will crash here (thanks to callingdefault_option
).
METHODS 2: BASE STRUCTURED ENTRY CLASS
The other class provided by the Structure
module is StructuredEntry
, the base class for all structured entry classes. This class inherits from Entry
, so all of its entry query/manipulation methods are available. StructuredEntry
adds methods for checking that an entry conforms to the database structure defined by a structure class.
It only makes sense for StructuredEntry
to be used as a base class; you would never create standalone StructuredEntry
objects. The superficial reason for this is that only particular structured-entry classes have an actual structure class associated with them, StructuredEntry
on its own doesn't have any information about allowed types, required fields, field constraints, and so on. For a deeper understanding, consult "CLASS INTERACTIONS" above.
Since StructuredEntry
derives from Entry
, it naturally operates on BibTeX entries. Hence, the following descriptions refer to "the entry"---this is just the object (entry) being operated on. Note that these methods are presented in bottom-up order, meaning that the methods you're most likely to actually use---check
, coerce
, and silently_coerce
are at the bottom. On a first reading, you'll probably want to skip down to them for a quick summary.
- structure ()
-
Returns the object that defines the structure the entry to which is supposed to conform. This will be an instantiation of some structure class, and exists mainly so the check/coerce methods can query the structure about the types and fields it recognizes. If, for some reason, you wanted to query an entry's structure about the validity of type
foo
, you might do this:# assume $entry is an object of some structured entry class, i.e. # it inherits from Text::BibTeX::StructuredEntry $structure = $entry->structure; $foo_known = $structure->known_type ('foo');
- check_type ([WARN])
-
Returns true if the entry has a valid type according to its structure. If WARN is true, then an invalid type results in a warning being printed.
- check_required_fields ([WARN [, COERCE]])
-
Checks that all required fields are present in the entry. If WARN is true, then a warning is printed for every missing field. If COERCE is true, then missing fields are set to the empty string.
This isn't generally used by other code; see the
check
andcoerce
methods below. - check_field_constraints ([WARN [, COERCE]])
-
Checks that the entry conforms to all of the field constraints imposed by its structure. Recall that a field constraint consists of a list of fields, and a minimum and maximum number of those fields that must be present in an entry. For each constraint,
check_field_constraints
simply counts how many fields in the constraint's field set are present. If this count falls below the minimum or above the maximum for that constraint and WARN is true, a warning is issued. In general, this warning is of the form "between x and y of fields foo, bar, and baz must be present". The more common cases are handled specially to generate more useful and human-friendly warning messages.If COERCE is true, then the entry is modified to force it into conformance with all field constraints. How this is done depends on whether the violation is a matter of not enough fields present in the entry, or of too many fields present. In the former case, just enough fields are added (as empty strings) to meet the requirements of the constraint; in the latter case, fields are deleted. Which fields to add or delete is controlled by the order of fields in the constraint's field list.
An example should clarify this. For instance, a field constraint specifying that exactly one of
author
oreditor
must appear in an entry would look like this:[1, 1, ['author', 'editor']]
Suppose the following entry is parsed and expected to conform to this structure:
@inbook{unknown:1997a, title = "An Unattributed Book Chapter", booktitle = "An Unedited Book", publisher = "Foo, Bar \& Company", year = 1997 }
If
check_field_constraints
is called on this method with COERCE true (which is done by any of thefull_check
,coerce
, andsilently_coerce
methods), then theauthor
field is set to the empty string. (We go through the list of fields in the constraint's field set in order -- sinceauthor
is the first missing field, we supply it; with that done, the entry now conforms to theauthor
/editor
constraint, so we're done.)However, if the same structure was applied to this entry:
@inbook{smith:1997a, author = "John Smith", editor = "Fred Jones", ... }
then the
editor
field would be deleted. In this case, we allow the first field in the constraint's field list---author
. Since only one field from the set may be present, all fields after the first one are in violation, so they are deleted.Again, this method isn't generally used by other code; rather, it is called by
full_check
and its friends below. - full_check ([WARN [, COERCE]])
-
Returns true if an entry's type and fields are all valid. That is, it calls
check_type
,check_required_fields
, andcheck_field_constraints
; if all of them return true, then so doesfull_check
. WARN and COERCE are simply passed on to the threecheck_*
methods: the first controls the printing of warnings, and the second decides whether we should modify the entry to force it into conformance. - check ()
-
Checks that the entry conforms to the requirements of its associated database structure: the type must be known, all required fields must be present, and all field constraints must be met. See
check_type
,check_required_fields
, andcheck_field_constraints
for details.Calling
check
is the same as callingfull_check
with WARN true and COERCE false. - coerce ()
-
Same as
check
, except entries are coerced into conformance with the database structure---that is, it's just likefull_check
with both WARN and COERCE true. - silently_coerce ()
-
Same as
coerce
, except warnings aren't printed---that is, it's just likefull_check
with WARN false and COERCE true.
SEE ALSO
Text::BibTeX, Text::BibTeX::Entry, Text::BibTeX::File
AUTHOR
Greg Ward <gward@python.net>
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 1997-2000 by Gregory P. Ward. All rights reserved. This file is part of the Text::BibTeX library. This library is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.