/ 
Rosetta-0.062
River stage zero No dependents
/ Rosetta::Framework

NAME

Rosetta::Framework - Main Rosetta purpose and design documentation

ABSTRACT

The Rosetta framework is intended to support complex (or simple) database-using Perl 5 applications that are easily portable across databases because all common product-specific details are abstracted away. Rosetta is designed to natively handle (interface to or implement) a superset of generic RDBMS product features, so that you can do any action that you could before, including standard data manipulation (including complex multi-table selects or updates with subqueries or stored procedure calls), and schema manipulation (tables, views, procedures). At the same time, it is designed to do its work quickly and efficiently. The native interface of Rosetta (RNI) is unique to itself and verbose, being designed to use non-ambiguous structured definitions of all tasks; all input is multi-dimensional data structures (or objects) having atomic values, rather than strings to be parsed. It is intended primarily for a data-driven application programming model, where an application uses a "data dictionary" to control what work it is doing (whose composite values map directly). For cases where you don't already have a data dictionary, Rosetta can scan your existing database to create one. That said, Rosetta also includes emulators (which sit on RNI) for common existing database interfaces, so that most Perl applications can simply use Rosetta as a hot-swappable replacement for them; you do not have to "learn yet another language" or re-code your application in order for it to just work with more databases. Add-on utilities are also available for the likes of copying or backing up a database, or editing one through a web interface (like PHPMyAdmin but for Perl and any RDBMS).

DEPENDENCIES

Perl Version

5.004 (by intent; tested with 5.6)

Standard Modules

I<none>

Nonstandard Modules

I<none>

SYNOPSIS

Content of settings file "survey_prefs.pl", used by script below:

my $rh_prefs = {
	pdbi_connect_args => {
		driver => 'Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-3-23',
		server => 'survey1',
		user => 'joebloe',
		pass => 'fdDF9X0sd7zy',
	},
	question_list => [
		{
			visible_title => "What's your name?",
			type => 'str',
			name => 'name',
			is_required => 1,
		}, {
			visible_title => "What's the combination?",
			type => 'int',
			name => 'words',
		}, {
			visible_title => "What's your favorite colour?",
			type => 'str',
			name => 'color',
		},
	],
};

Content of a simple CGI script for implementing a web survey:

#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;

&script_main();

sub script_main {
	my $base_url = 'http://'.($ENV{'HTTP_HOST'} || '127.0.0.1').$ENV{'SCRIPT_NAME'};
	my ($curr_mode) = $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'} =~ m/mode=([^&]*)/;

	my $form_data_str = '';
	read( STDIN, $form_data_str, $ENV{'CONTENT_LENGTH'} );
	chomp( $form_data_str );
	my %form_values = ();
	foreach my $pair (split( '&', $form_data_str )) {
		my ($key, $value) = split( '=', $pair, 2 );
		next if( $key eq "" );
		$key =~ tr/+/ /;
		$key =~ s/%([0-9a-fA-F]{2})/pack("c",hex($1))/ge;
		$value =~ tr/+/ /;
		$value =~ s/%([0-9a-fA-F]{2})/pack("c",hex($1))/ge;
		$form_values{$key} = $value;
	}

	my $fn_prefs = 'survey_prefs.pl';

	print
		"Status: 200 OK\n",
		"Content-type: text/html\n\n",
		"<html><head>\n",
		"<title>Simple Web Survey</title>\n",
		"</head><body>\n",
		"<p><a href=\"$base_url?mode=install\">Install Schema</a>\n",
		" | <a href=\"$base_url?mode=remove\">Remove Schema</a>\n",
		" | <a href=\"$base_url?mode=fillin\">Fill In Form</a>\n",
		" | <a href=\"$base_url?mode=report\">See Report</a></p>\n",
		"<hr />\n",
		"<form method=\"POST\" action=\"$base_url?mode=$curr_mode\">\n",
		"<p>\n",
		(&script_make_screen( $fn_prefs, $curr_mode, \%form_values )),
		"</p>\n",
		"<p><input type=\"submit\" name=\"OK\" value=\"Do It Now\" /></p>\n",
		"</form>\n",
		"</body></html>\n";
}

sub script_make_screen {
	my ($fn_prefs, $curr_mode, $form_values) = @_;

	my $prefs = do $fn_prefs;
	unless( ref( $prefs ) eq 'HASH' ) {
		return( "Error: can't obtain required preferences hash from '$fn_prefs': ".
			(defined( $prefs ) ? "result not a hash ref, but '$prefs'" : 
			$@ ? "compilation or runtime error of '$@'" : $!) );
	}

	eval {
		require Rosetta::Engine; # also compiles ...::* modules
	};
	if( $@ ) {
		return( "Error: can't compile Rosetta::Engine/::* modules: $@" );
	}

	my $engine = Rosetta::Engine->new();
	$engine->throw_error( 0 ); # on error, ret result obj, do not throw exception

	my $dbh = $engine->execute_command( {
		'type' => 'database_connect',
		'args' => $prefs->{pdbi_connect_args}, # includes what driver to use
	} );
	if( $dbh->is_error() ) {
		return( "Error: can't connect to database: ".$dbh->get_error() );
	}

	my $html_output = &script_while_connected( $prefs, $dbh, $curr_mode, $form_values );

	my $rv = $dbh->execute_command( {
		'type' => 'database_disconnect',
	} );
	if( $rv->is_error() ) {
		return( "Error: can't disconnect from database: ".$rv->get_error() );
	}

	return( $html_output );
}

sub script_while_connected {
	my ($prefs, $dbh, $curr_mode, $form_values) = @_;

	my $questions = $prefs->{question_list};
	unless( ref( $questions ) eq 'ARRAY' and scalar( @{$questions} ) > 0 ) {
		return( "Error: no survey question list defined in prefs file" );
	}

	my $dd_table = Rosetta::Schema::Table->new( 'survey_data' );

	foreach my $question (@{$questions}) {
		unless( ref( $question ) eq 'HASH' and $question->{visible_title} ) {
			return( "Error: invalid question defined in prefs file" );
		}
		$dd_table->add_column( { 
			'name' => $question->{name},
			'data_type' => { 'base_type' => $question->{type}, },
			'is_req' => $question->{is_required},
		} ) or return( "Error: invalid question defined in prefs file" );
	}

	if( $curr_mode eq 'install' ) {
		return( &script_do_install( $dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values ) );
	}

	if( $curr_mode eq 'remove' ) {
		return( &script_do_remove( $dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values ) );
	}

	if( $curr_mode eq 'fillin' ) {
		return( &script_do_fillin( $dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values ) );
	}

	if( $curr_mode eq 'report' ) {
		return( &script_do_report( $dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values ) );
	}

	return( "This is a simple demo.  Click on the menu items to do them." );
}

sub script_to_install {
	my ($dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values) = @_;

	unless( $form_values->{OK} ) {  
		# user is seeing screen for first time (did not click 'OK' button)
		return( join( "", 
			"<h1>Install Schema</h1>\n",
			"<p>Do you want to install new schema to store answers for ", 
			"the following questions?</p>\n",
			"<ol>\n",
			(map { "<li>".$_->{visible_title}."</li>\n" } @{$questions}),
			"</ol>\n",
		) );
	}

	# user saw screen and clicked the 'OK' button, so try to install;
	# the following makes a Command of type 'table_create' and executes it

	my $rv = $dbh->execute_command( $dd_table->new_command_create() );
	if( $rv->is_error() ) {
		return( "Error: can't create survey table: ".$rv->get_error() );
	}

	return( "The new schema was successfully created." );
}

sub script_to_remove {
	my ($dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values) = @_;

	unless( $form_values->{OK} ) {  
		# user is seeing screen for first time (did not click 'OK' button)
		return( join( "", 
			"<h1>Remove Schema</h1>\n",
			"<p>Do you want to remove existing schema to store answers for ", 
			"the following questions?</p>\n",
			"<ol>\n",
			(map { "<li>".$_->{visible_title}."</li>\n" } @{$questions}),
			"</ol>\n",
		) );
	}

	# user saw screen and clicked the 'OK' button, so try to destroy;
	# the following makes a Command of type 'table_destroy' and executes it

	my $rv = $dbh->execute_command( $dd_table->new_command_destroy() );
	if( $rv->is_error() ) {
		return( "Error: can't remove survey table: ".$rv->get_error() );
	}

	return( "The new schema was successfully removed." );
}

sub script_to_fillin {
	my ($dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values) = @_;

	unless( $form_values->{OK} ) {  
		# user is seeing screen for first time (did not click 'OK' button)
		return( join( "", 
			"<h1>Fill In Form</h1>\n",
			"<p>Please answer the following questions.  ",
			"Those marked with a '*' are required.</p>\n",
			(map { 
					'<p>'.($_->{is_required} ? '*' : '').$_->{visible_title}.":".
					'<input type="text" name="'.$_->{name}.'" /></p>'."\n"
				} @{$questions}),
		) );
	}

	# user saw screen and clicked the 'OK' button, so try to destroy;
	# the following makes a Command of type 'data_insert' and executes it
	my $dd_view = Rosetta::Schema::Table->new( $dd_table );
	my $rv = $dbh->execute_command( $dd_view->new_command_insert( $form_values ) );
	if( $rv->is_error() ) {
		return( "Error: can't save form values in database: ".$rv->get_error() );
	}

	return( "Your form submission was saved successfully." );
}

sub script_to_report {
	my ($dbh, $dd_table, $questions, $form_values) = @_;

	# the following makes a Command of type 'data_select' and executes it
	my $dd_view = Rosetta::Schema::Table->new( $dd_table );
	my $cursor = $dbh->execute_command( $dd_view->new_command_select() );
	if( $cursor->is_error() ) {
		return( "Error: can't fetch form values from database: ".$cursor->get_error() );
	}
	my $rowset = $cursor->get_all_rows();

	my @html_output = (
		"<h1>See Report</h1>\n",
		"<p>Here are the answers that previous visitors gave:</p>\n",
		"<table>\n",
		"<tr>\n",
		(map { "<th>".$_->{visible_title}."</th>\n" } @{$questions}),
		"</tr>\n",
	);
	my @question_names = map { $_->{name} } @{$questions};
	foreach my $row (@{$rowset}) {
		push( @html_output, 
			"<tr>\n",
			(map { "<td>".$row->{$_}."</td>\n" } @question_names),
			"</tr>\n",
		);
	}
	push( @html_output, "</table>\n" );

	return( join( "", @html_output ) );
}

1;

DESCRIPTION

The Rosetta framework is intended to support complex (or simple) database-using applications that are easily portable across databases because common product-specific details are abstracted away. These include the RDBMS product and vendor name, what dialect of SQL its scripting or query interface uses, whether the product uses SQL at all or some other method of querying, how query results are returned, what features the RDBMS supports, how to manage connections, how to manage schema, how to manage stored procedures, and perhaps how to manage users. The main thing that this framework will not be doing in the forseeable future is managing the installation and configuration of the RDBMS itself, which may be on the same machine or a different one.

There are two main types of functionality that the Rosetta framework is designed to implement; this functionality may be better described in different groupings.

The first functionality type is the management (creation, modification, deletion) of the schema in a database, including: tables, keys, constraints, relations, sequences, views, stored procedures, triggers, and users. This type of functionality typically is used infrequently and sets things up for the main functionality of your database-using application(s). In some cases, typically with single-user desktop applications, the application may install its own schema, and/or create new database files, when it starts up or upon the user's prompting; this can be analogous to the result of a "New..." (or "Save As...") command in a desktop financial management or file archiving application; the application would then carry on to use the schema as its personal working space. In other cases, typically with multiple-user client-server applications, one "Installer" or "Manager" type application or process with exclusive access will be run once to create the schema, and then a separate application or process will be run to make use of it as a shared working space.

The second functionality type is the management (creation, modification, deletion) of the data in a database, including such operations as: direct selects from single or multiple tables or views, direct inserts or updates or deletes of records, calling stored procedures, using sequences, managing temporary tables, managing transactions, managing data integrity. This type of functionality typically is used frequently and comprises the main functionality of your database-using application(s). In some cases, typically with public-accessible websites or services, all or most users will just be viewing data and not changing anything; everyone would use the same database user and they would not be prompted for passwords or other security credentials. In other cases, typically with private or restricted-access websites or services, all or most users will also be changing data; everyone would have their own real or application-simulated database user, whom they log in as with a password or other credentials; as the application implements, these users can have different activity privileges, and their actions can be audited.

The Rosetta framework can be considered a low-level service because it allows a fine level of granularity or detail for the commands you can make of it and the results you get back; you get a detailed level of control. But it is not low-level in the way that you would be entering any raw SQL, or even small fragments of raw SQL; that is expressly avoided because it would expose implementation details that aren't true on all databases. Rather, this framework provides the means for you to specify in an RDBMS-generic fashion exactly what it is you want to happen, and your request is mapped to native or emulated functionality for the actual RDBMS that is being used, to do the work. The implementation or mapping is different for each RDBMS being abstracted away, and makes maximum use of that database's built-in functionality. Thereby, the Rosetta framework achieves the greatest performance possible while still being 100% RDBMS-generic.

This differs from other database abstraction modules or frameworks that I am aware of on CPAN, since the others tend to either work towards the lowest-common-denominator database while emulating more complex functionality, which is very slow, or more often they provide a much more limited number of abstracted functions and expect you to do things manually (which is specific to single databases or non-portable) with any other functionality you need. With many modules, even the abstracted functions tend to accept sql fragments as part of their input, which in the broadest sense makes those non-portable as well. With my framework I am attempting the "holy grail" of maximum portability with maximum features and maximum speed, which to my knowledge none of the existing solutions on CPAN are doing, or would be able to do short of a full rewrite. This is largely why I am starting a new module framework rather than trying to help patch an existing solution; I believe a rewrite is needed.

The Rosetta framework is best used through its native interface (RNI), which accepts and returns only atomic values (or multi-dimensional Perl data structures containing them); no "parsing" or such analysis is done such as with SQL statements. The main reason is that this framework is intended primarily for a data-driven application programming model, where the applications use a "data dictionary" to control what work it is doing; the applications can simply copy the composite scalar values of the data dictionary, without having to encode them into a single string. The RNI is designed to allow entry of a non-ambiguous structured definition of any task that you would want a database to do. Rosetta is intended to support a superset of features from all common generic RDBMS products, so it should have a native way of expressing any task that you can do now. For cases where you don't already have a data dictionary, Rosetta can scan your existing database to create one.

One would think that, despite all the advantages that Rosetta can bring to a new application that is designed around RNI (or a simplifying wrapper of it), it wouldn't be very helpful to an existing older application that is built around "a different way of doing things". From the latter perspective, there looks to be just as much work involved in porting their application to use Rosetta as there would be to port it to a new database or other interface framework. The problem would be the all-too-common having to "learn yet another language", and then port the application to it (for that matter, it would be a new language for new app builders as well, although that may not be the same problem). Either transition could be a significant cost and the hurdle can deter upgrades to making apps portable.

But to help with this situation, Rosetta also includes several emulators (each of which is a higher-level layer that translates its input into RNI calls) for common existing database interfaces, so that most Perl applications can simply use Rosetta as a hot-swappable replacement for them; you do not have to "learn yet another language" or re-code your application in order for it to just work with more databases. It should be possible to emulate any existing interface, and if a new one comes along with features that Rosetta can't handle (interface to or implement), then this is a reasonable excuse to update the core so that it is possible. That said, the success of an emulator depends largely on whether code that was using the original module is using the original the way it was designed or not; code that was hacking the internals of a module (as Perl makes so easy) is less likely to work (sort of like how an app used to using un-documented APIs on an operating sytem, or doing direct OS data structure access on a non-memory-protected OS, would break if the implementation of that OS changed).

Included in the Rosetta distribution will be several applications which serve as examples of Rosetta in use, but in some cases are useful themselves. One example will be a utility for copying one database to another, such as for backup or restore, or just migration. Another example will be a web app that works sort of like "PHPMyAdmin" (letting users manually edit schema and data) except that it is written in Perl, and it works with many RDBMS products. Some code porting utilities could also be available, to help makers of old applications migrate to RNI, for better control and performance than an emulator would provide.

STRUCTURE

The modules composing the Rosetta framework are grouped into several main categories, which can be called: "Schema", "Engine", "Driver", "Locale", "Emulator", and others.

These classes do not export any functions or methods, so you need to call them using object notation. This means using Class->function() for functions and $object->method() for methods. If you are inheriting any class for your own modules, then that often means something like $self->method().

The "Schema" and "Engine" modules are collectively referred to as the "Rosetta Native Interface" or "RNI", and they are the "Core" of the Rosetta framework to which all else is attached. The distinction between the two is that Schema modules are purely container objects which hold descriptions of "things" (such as data types or tables or views), while Engine modules typically are not containers and represent "actions" (such as connections or cursors). Schema objects are complete on their own and can be serialized or stored indefinately off site for later retrieval and use, such as with a "data dictionary" describing a table or view. Engine objects only make sense within the context where they were created and often contain time-sensitive data; it wouldn't make sense to store them except during the short term, such as with a pool of active and reusable database connections. It is common for Engine objects to hold Schema objects as properties, to help them know how to do their actions, such as how to create a table or select from it.

The Driver modules are what enable Rosetta to use each type of database. They are what handle (interface to or implement) all the details of using a specific RDBMS product; you need at least one for each unique RDBMS product you plan to run your application on; they are "action" modules. They take Engine/Schema objects as input and convert them into the actual SQL or other method calls that the RDBMS products use, then they invoke the generated, and then interpret the results into other Engine/Schema objects to return as output. The Driver modules also deal with extracting any existing schema stored in an RDBMS so they can generate an RNI data dictionary from it when desired. Nothing talks to an RDBMS product except a Driver module, and nothing talks to a driver module except the Engine modules.

The Locale modules function as constant data resources, mainly holding user-readable text such as database error messages and so forth, so that this text is separate from normal module code and easy to edit. These are part of the Rosetta core, and are used by the Engine and Driver modules. There are multiple Locale files rather than just one partly so that each file can have a different localization; adding a new user language is as easy as adding another file. The set of text strings being stored should be comprehensive enough that any Driver module can use them, and therefore not need their own Locale files for displaying error messages. All strings are mapped to short codes (eg: 'R001372'); these codes are what the normal module code uses to display a particular message.

The Emulator modules are extensions that are purely optional for use, and they are intended to facilitate rapid adaption (hot-swapping) of Rosetta into an existing application that is already built around a different database interface (such as DBI or ODBC or OCI). Each Emulator module is a higher-level layer which translates its input into pure RNI calls and translates the output correspondingly; each should have an identical public interface to what it emulates. So applications often won't need to be changed to use Rosetta, but they still just become more portable. Many Emulator modules would include SQL parsing functionality (as SQL is their input), and would convert SQL statements from known dialects into Engine/Schema objects

This briefly illustrates the relationship of the module groups:

        RDBMS
          |
          |
          |
        Driver--------------\
called by |   uses   used by \
          |                   \
  invokes |                    \
        Engine--------------Schema;Locale (both used by same 4 groups)
called by | \ uses   used by /  |
          |  \              /   |
  invokes |   \            /   /
          | Emulator------/   /
          | | uses   used by /
          | |               /
          | |              /
        APPLICATION-------/
              uses   used by

Note that application specific "stored procedures" which are implemented in Perl, and that are RDBMS product specific, would sit beside "Driver" in the above diagram, since they would have direct access to the product-specific code that the Driver uses to talk to the RDBMS. Those are not shown in the above diagram for simplicity. That said, all calls to such "stored procedures" from the main APPLICATION will still always go through Engine.

BRIEF MODULE LIST

Note that the exact module names and descriptions listed within each grouping are an older draft and are subject to near-future revisions or rewrites, including addition of more modules or removal of some existing ones. Also, not all of these exist yet, as they are being implemented over time.

In distribution "Rosetta"

Rosetta (a placeholder in the public eye for the whole framework; a shim)

Rosetta::Framework (POD only, holds main framework documentation)
Rosetta::SimilarModules (POD only, compares and contrasts Rosetta with other modules)

Rosetta::Locale (constant data resources, user-readable text base class, allows var subst)
Rosetta::Locale::en (English localization)
Rosetta::Locale::fr (French localization)
Rosetta::Locale::* ... like German, Spanish, Dutch, Chinese, etc

Rosetta::Schema (represents one database schema; owned by one database user)
Rosetta::Schema::DataType (metadata for individual atomic or scalar values)
Rosetta::Schema::Table (details of table columns are part of this class)
Rosetta::Schema::View (a parsed select, used for any DML like IUD, gen stored views)
Rosetta::Schema::User
Rosetta::Schema::Privilege (or PrivilegeType)
Rosetta::Schema::Procedure (or Function)
Rosetta::Schema::* ... like Trigger, Sequence, Package, whatever

Rosetta::Engine (base class to provide 'execute' function; calls Drivers)
Rosetta::Engine::Command (describes an action to do)
Rosetta::Engine::Result (result of action including errors)
Rosetta::Engine::Connection (represents a connection)
Rosetta::Engine::Transaction (represents context within connection)
Rosetta::Engine::Cursor (result of a selection command)
Rosetta::Engine::* ... like DriverEngineGlobals or whatever

Rosetta::Driver (base class to provide common public interface)
Rosetta::Driver::Native (a fully functional RAM-based RDBMS impl in Perl, for testing core)

In distribution "Rosetta-Drivers"

Rosetta::Driver::ANSI-SQL-99 (base class for common implementation, uses DBI/DBD::*)
Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-3-23 (generate and run SQL for MySQL 3.23.x)
Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-4-0 (generate and run SQL for MySQL 4.0.x)
Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-4-1 (generate and run SQL for MySQL 4.1.x)
Rosetta::Driver::Oracle-8 (generate and run SQL for Oracle 8)
Rosetta::Driver::Oracle-9 (generate and run SQL for Oracle 9)
Rosetta::Driver::* ... like Sybase, DB2, PostgreSQL, SQLServer, Informix, more

In distribution "Rosetta-Emulators"

Rosetta::Emulator::DBI (emulates DBI/DBD::*, but result is more portable)
Rosetta::Emulator::ODBC (emulates an ODBC module, result more portable)
Rosetta::Emulator::OCI (emulates an OCI module, result more portable)
Rosetta::Emulator::* ... like some of the other abstraction modules
Rosetta::Emulator::*::* (helpers for emulated frameworks of several modules)

In distribution "Rosetta-Applications"

Rosetta::Util::* ... higher level functionality like: Backup, Restore, Copy, ...

In unknown distributions

Rosetta::* ... who knows ...

Rosetta::Adapter::* ... I like the name so it might be used for something

RosettaX::* ... unofficial extensions or wrappers to Rosetta are allowed here ...

SCHEDULE FOR DEVELOPMENT

In an effort to keep things simpler for development, the first few releases of this distribution will contain some of the intended features, while others will be left out for now, but be dealt with later at an appropriate time.

This is the approximate order that I plan to support particular features:

0

Connect to (or open) an existing database as a registered or anonymous user, which establishes a current working context for doing anything else, and close it; multiple simultaneous connections should be supported; the database and users must already exist.

0

Create new database instances or remove them, if that can be done easily.

0

Create new users in the current database or remove them or alter their privileges or validate any settings for user existence or privileges; note that Rosetta will not enforce user privileges or lacks of them for any RDBMS products that don't do this internally.

0

Create tables (including temporary) within the default schema context that you connected to (eg: an Oracle "user/schema" in an "instance"), with nullability or unique key (including primary key) or foreign key constraints or indexes that are not constraints or default column values, and alter or remove or validate them, assuming the connected user has said privileges; the same operations will also be supported against neighbouring contexts (if any) for which said user is permitted; note that Rosetta will not enforce any constraints on tables as that is up to the RDBMS product, although it may try to enforce some constraints in a far-away release for RDBMS products that don't do it themselves, but that would be slower and less reliable.

0

Create or alter or remove sequences within the default schema context, and use them in table definitions or data modifying operations.

0

Scan an existing database and create a data dictionary (as Perl objects) that describes its tables and sequences, including any constraints that the database knows about.

0

Start a transaction, which is an operating context within which all table data changes must succeed or none will be saved, and end it either with a commit (keep changes) or rollback (discard changes); this type of data integrity will not work unless the RDBMS product being used supports transactions; far-off releases of Rosetta may implement transactional data integrity at the Perl level for non-supporting RDBMS products, but using a supporting RDBMS is better; multiple simultaneous transactions within a single database connection should be supported.

0

Select data from single or related multiple tables, including the use of equal or left outer joins, full and unique unions (similar to full outer joins), derived tables (in sql-from), sub-selects (in sql-where), hierarchical queries (eg: an Oracle start-with and connect-by), and including the use of calculations or formulas (including logicals like choose-when) in the returned column list or in the row filter or grouping conditions; the select results can be accessed either with row cursors (memory efficient) or all at once with an array (for small result sets only); also, insert or update or delete against single tables.

0

Obtain locks on table data for when you want atomic selects and updates, and release them; the same caveats that apply to transaction support in the RDBMS product being used also applies here.

0

Utilities for backing up or restoring the tables in a database, both schema and data, either with another database or a set of text files.

0

Insert or update or delete against multiple related related tables at once, as if they were a single table; the Rosetta objects that define the multiple table selection will be used to know how to map said data changes against the correct tables; it may not be possible for Rosetta to issue changes against some selects, since some required mapping information may be lacking; in that case, the application logic will have to handle it against single tables.

0

Create stored procedures and functions within the default schema context that you connected to, and alter or remove them, and invoke them directly; initially this feature will require you to define a separate version of a stored procedure or function for each RDBMS product you are going to use, because it is too difficult to implement an abstracted definition and generation of such things for earlier Rosetta releases; there are two ways to do this, one of which involves writing the functionality in pure Perl (which can be done once for all RDBMS products, particularly those that don't support stored procedures at all, but is slower), and the other way involves a hand-crafted SQL string implementing the procedure plus a shim Perl function that calls it; your main application is still RDBMS generic because any multiplicity of stored procedure implementations will be keyed to a Rosetta driver, so the right one is used at the right time; in any event, the standard RNI means of calling a stored procedure is calling something that looks externally like a Perl function, which won't change, so you will still have to make at least the interface in Perl; also modify or delete them, or validate those added through Rosetta.

0

Call stored functions within select queries and so forth; this would likely only work when the stored item is actually in the database, and is not a pure Perl implementation.

0

Create stored triggers, with the same caveats as stored procedures and functions regarding multiplicity of implementations, or update or remove them, or validate those added through Rosetta; initially this feature will not work at all unless the underlying RDBMS supports triggers, since early Rosetta releases will not interrupt or scan data UID operations to implement triggers in Perl.

0

Create or alter or remove "public synonyms" in Oracle or other RDBMS that support the concept of this convenient aliasing system.

0

Create views, which are select queries whose definitions are stored in a database for convenience and pre-processing speed, within the default schema context that you connected to, and alter or remove them; validating views will at first only be possible if the same version of Rosetta created them, because it is done by a simple string compare for databases that store views as sql statements, so that the sql won't have to be parsed.

0

Also scan the views in an existing database and parse their definition sql so that generated data dictionaries can describe both tables, views, and seqs.

0

Also extract the stored procedures and functions and triggers and so forth in their raw form, unparsed, for backup or restore to the same kind of RDBMS that they came from.

0

Emulate other database interfaces (like DBI or ODBC or OCI or whatever) on top of Rosetta; this would require being able to parse SQL like for data selection or modification, or table and view creation, and so forth, as well as pass through unparsed the creation sql of stored procedures and functions and triggers for use as is (latter not portable).

0

Get around to parsing or generating sql for stored procedures or functions or triggers, and representing them abstractly for a data dictionary.

0

Whatever else is needed.

On databases that don't support sub-selects (eg: MySQL before 4.1.x) or unions (eg: MySQL before 4.0.x) natively, Rosetta::Driver::* will try to emulate complex select commands by creating temporary tables in the database to hold results of inner selects. This would keep all the implementation work inside the RDBMS product where it should be, with only the final resulting row-set being returned to the Perl application. However, it is possible that this will only work if the database user being connected as has the privileges to create tables, which isn't always the case for DML-only users; on the other hand, temporary tables may not require said permissions. There may also be problems with reliability of the results if someone else is modifying the inputs for the temporary tables before they are all built; this may change later when proper read locks are used.

EXPANDED MODULE LIST

Note that the exact module names and descriptions listed within each grouping are an older draft and are subject to near-future revisions or rewrites, including addition of more modules or removal of some existing ones.

Note also that a bunch of summary documentation was dropped between release 0.01 and 0.02, since it was at least partly redundant with other additions in 0.02; the remaining parts should be brought back soon.

Note the third: now that some of these modules have been implemented, their updated descriptions here are more accurate.

SCHEMA MODULES

0

Rosetta::Schema::DataType - This Schema class describes a simple data type, which serves as metadata for a single atomic or scalar unit of data, or a column whose members are all of the same data type, such as in a regular database table or in row sets read from or to be written to one. This class would be used both when manipulating database schema and when manipulating database data.

0

Rosetta::Schema::Table - This Schema class describes a single database table, and would be used for such things as managing schema for the table (eg: create, alter, destroy), and describing the table's "public interface" so other functionality like views or various DML operations know how to use the table. In its simplest sense, a Table object consists of a table name, a list of table columns, a list of keys, a list of constraints, and a few other implementation details. This class does not describe anything that is changed by DML activity, such as a count of stored records, or the current values of sequences attached to columns. This class would be used both when manipulating database schema and when manipulating database data. This class can generate Rosetta::Engine::Command objects having types of: 'table_verify', 'table_create', 'table_alter', 'table_destroy'.

0

Rosetta::Schema::View - This Schema class describes a single database view, which conceptually looks like a table, but it is used differently. Tables and views are similar in that they both represent or store a matrix of data, which has uniquely identifiable columns, and rows which can be uniquely identifiable but may not be. With the way that Rosetta implements views, you can do all of the same DML operations with them that you can do with tables: select, insert, update, delete rows; that said, the process for doing any of those with views is more complicated than with tables, but this complexity is usually internal to Rosetta so you shouldn't have to code any differently between them. Tables and views are different in that tables actually store data in themselves, while views don't. A view is actually a custom abstracted interface to one or more database tables which are related to each other in a specific way; when you issue DML against a view, you are actually fetching from or modifying the data stored in one (simplest case) or more tables. This class can generate Rosetta::Engine::Command objects having types of: 'data_select', 'data_insert', 'data_update', 'data_delete', 'data_lock', 'data_unlock', 'view_verify', 'view_create', 'view_alter', 'view_destroy'.

ENGINE MODULES

0

Rosetta::Engine - This Engine class is inherited by all other Engine Engine classes, and it provides functionality to talk to or manage Driver modules. Its main task is to define the execute_command() method, which takes a Command object saying what should be done next and returns or throws a Result object saying what actually was done (or what errors there were). For some command types, execute_command() may only start the process that needs doing (eg: get a select cursor), and invoking execute_command() again on the Result object (which is a subclass) will continue or finish the process (eg: fetch a row). Instantiated by itself, this class stores globals that are shared by all drivers or connections. Subclasses include: Result, Connection.

0

Rosetta::Engine::Command - This Schema class describes an action that needs to be done against a database; the action may include several steps, and all of them must be done when executing the Command. A Command object has one mandatory string property named 'type' (eg: 'database_connect', 'table_create', 'data_insert'), which sets the context for all of its other properties, which are in a hash property named 'args'. Elements of 'args' often include other Engine class objects like 'Table' or 'DataType'.

0

Rosetta::Engine::Result - This Engine class is inherited by all Engine classes that would be returned from or thrown by an execute_command() method, and it contains the return values or errors of a Command. Its main task is to implement the is_error() and get_error() methods, which say whether the Command failed or not, and if so then why. Some commands (eg: 'database_disconnect') have no other meta-data or data to return, while others do (eg: 'data_select'). Subclasses include: Connection.

0

Rosetta::Engine::Connection - This Engine class represents a connection to a database instance, and the simplest database applications use only one. You instantiate a Connection object by executing a Command of type 'database_connect'; that command usually takes 4 arguments, the first of which is mandatory: 'driver' is a string having the name of the Driver module to use, which also defines what RDBMS product is being used; 'server' is the name of the specific database instance to use; 'user' is the username to authenticate yourself against a multi-user database as; 'pass' is the associated password.

0

Rosetta::Engine::Cursor - This Engine class represents a cursor over a rowset that is being selected from a database. You instantiate a Cursor object by executing a command of type 'data_select'; that command usually takes 1 argument, which is mandatory: 'view' is a View object that describes the select statement being run, including what columns it has and their datatypes, what the source tables are, how they are joined, what the row filters are, sort order, and row limiting or paging.

DRIVER MODULES

0

Rosetta::Driver - This class defines the specific public API that all Driver classes must have, which is what the appropriate Engine classes will call them with; it is an error condition if you pass a module as a driver and that module doesn't subclass this one; also, do not instantiate this class directly, as it doesn't implement the methods it declares.

0

Rosetta::Driver::Native - This class implements a fully-functional stand-alone RDBMS, using 100% Perl code; it will implement all database features that the Rosetta core can interface to, even if some real databases can't. This includes transactions, locking, foreign keys, stored procedures, multiple 'users', and more. That said, it is intended mainly for testing the Rosetta core, and will be developed simultaneously with the latter. While Rosetta::Driver::Native is fully functional, it is completely RAM-based for simplicity (nothing is stored on disk, except perhaps by means of explicit freeze/thaw or the like), and probably won't scale to more than a few thousand records (namely, it will hold just whatever can all fit in RAM at once). It also won't be designed with multi-threaded environments in mind, due to its intent for testing (usually done by one person at a time); if you plan to use it for more, you will need to serialize access yourself.

0

Rosetta::Driver::ANSI-SQL-99 - This class implements most Driver methods using SQL that is compliant to the ANSI SQL standard. It is not intended to be used by itself, but rather subclassed by another Driver module for a specific RDBMS product. This class assumes that DBI and DBD::* modules will be used for implementation, so it uses DBI objects and methods internally. It currently does not implement the 'database_connect' command because subclasses should be choosing which DBD::* module to use internally.

0

Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-3-23 - This class implements a driver for talking to MySQL 3.23.x databases. This version of MySQL does not support most kinds of sub-selects and unions, so this driver emulates that functionality by creating temporary tables; you can only use those features if you connect as a user with privileges to make temporary tables. Note that 3.23.54 is the latest release and is considered production-quality (stable) since 2001.01.22.

0

Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-4-0 - This class implements a driver for talking to MySQL 4.0.x databases. This version of MySQL does not support most kinds of sub-selects, so this driver emulates that functionality by creating temporary tables; you can only use those features if you connect as a user with privileges to make temporary tables. Note that 4.0.7 is the latest release and is considered gamma-quality (soon to be stable?).

0

Rosetta::Driver::MySQL-4-1 - This class implements a driver for talking to MySQL 4.1.x databases. This version of MySQL does support most kinds of sub-selects and unions, so this driver does not need to emulate them, and you can use these features even when you connect as a user that can not create temporary tables. Note that 4.1.0 is the latest release and is considered alpha-quality (perhaps stable in a year?).

0

Rosetta::Driver::Oracle-8 - This class implements a driver for talking to Oracle 8.x databases.

0

Rosetta::Driver::Oracle-9 - This class implements a driver for talking to Oracle 9.x databases. Note that Oracle 9 is the first version of the Oracle database that runs under Mac OS X (10.2 and later).

All other databases in common use should be supported as well; the ones in the above module list are vendors that I have used personally; I need to research others to know what versions exist or are stable or are in common use. Other RDBMS products include: Sybase, PostgreSQL, DB2, SQL-Server, OpenBase, FrontBase, Valentina, Informix, ODBC, and others.

MISCELLANEOUS MODULES FROM AFAR

In this context, "Wrapper" is a type of Rosetta extension that sits between the application and the RNI, such as Emulators. But Wrappers take many forms, most of which will not be included with this distribution.

One form of Wrapper is a value-added extension, possibly more application-specific, such as an interpreter for data dictionaries. For example, a data dictionary could say that an application is composed of screens or forms that are related in a certain way; each screen would contain several controls of various types, and some controls may correspond to specific columns in database tables. The module in question would determine from the data dictionary what needs to be retrieved from the database to support a particular screen, and ask the Engine modules to go get it. Similarly, if the application user edits data on the screens that should then be saved back to the database, the Wrapper module would ask the Engine modules to save it. On the other side of things, it is quite possible that the data dictionary for the application is itself stored in the database, and so the Engine modules can be asked to fetch portions of it as the Wrapper module requires.

Another form of Wrapper is an interface customizer or simplifier. if you know that certain details of your commands to Engine will always be the same, or you just like to express your needs in a different way, you can take care of the default values in a wrapper module, so that the rest of your application simply has to provide inputs that aren't always the same.

Another form of Wrapper is a data parser or serializer. For example, to convert database output to XML or convert XML to a database command (although, certain kinds of XML processing may be better implemented in the Engine/Driver layers for performance reasons, but if so it would still be an extension).

Another form of Wrapper is a command parser for various SQL dialects. For example, if you want to quickly port an application, which already includes SQL statements that are tailored to a specific database product, to a different database for which it is incompatible, a Wrapper module could parse that statement into the object representation that Engine uses. This is effectively an SQL-to-SQL translator. I would expect that, citing reasons of performance or application code simplicity, one wouldn't want to use this functionality long-term, but replace the SQL with Engine object definitions later.

Finally, one could also make Wrappers which emulate other database abstraction solutions for similar reasons to the above, which is a different type of quick porting. Since the intended feature set of Rosetta should be a superset of existing solutions' feature sets, it should be possible to emulate them with it.

ROSETTA NATIVE DATA DICTIONARY STRUCTURE

All concepts in the Rosetta Core, mainly those represented by the Schema modules, but to a lesser extent the Engine modules, can be represented by a data dictionary; such a data dictionary can be a linked in-memory set of objects (or serialized version thereof), or they can be represented by records in database tables having specific columns and constraints. This documentation will attempt to explain the components of a Rosetta data dictionary and how they relate; it is hierarchical-relational in design, and each component is expressed in terms of other components or atomic values like strings or numbers. For simplicity of syntax, this documentation will pretend to describe command or expression strings that are loosely similar to SQL, even if what they represent is not intended to be used in a serialized form.

Here is a brief legend of syntax used here; it isn't perfect:

:= - means name on left is defined by expression on the right
TEXT - represents literal text (literal in serialized form anyway)
<text> - represents a named component that is defined near-by
() - represents a grouping or boundary of portions used together
| - an exclusive-or meaning to use either portion on left or on right
{n,n} - means allowed number of repetitions of on left (delimited by commas)
[] - represents an optional portion
# - start of a line comment
... definition is described by comment rather than given normally

Here are the component definitions, not quite complete:

<database> := DATABASE 
	HAS (<namespace>{0,})

<namespace> := NAMESPACE 
	ID (<entity-id>) 
	HIERARCHY (<entity-id>{0,2})  # eg: Oracle user/schema name, db instance name
	HAS (<schema-object>{0,})

<entity-id> := ...  # scalar value: either an alphanumeric string or an integer

<schema-object> := (<table>|<sequence>|<view>|<procedure>|<trigger>)

<table> := TABLE 
	ID (<table-id>)
	COLUMNS (<table-column>{1,})
	UNIQUE CONSTRAINT (<unique-key>{0,})  # refers to columns in same table only
	FOREIGN CONSTRAINT (<foreign-key>{0,})  # refers to columns in same table only

<table-id> := <entity-id>

<table-column> := 
	ID (<column-id>) 
	TYPE (<data-type>)
	[IS REQUIRED (<boolean>)]  # results in NOT NULL if true; NULL if false
	[DEFAULT (<column-default>)]

<column-id> := <entity-id>

<data-type> := 
	[NAME (<entity-id>)]
	BASE (<base-type>)
	[SIZE (<data-size>)]

<base-type> := (boolean|int|float|datetime|str|binary)

<data-size> := ...  # an integer; if not given, has default val based on <base-type>

<boolean> := (false|true)  # alternately 0 = false; 1 = true

<column-default> := ((LITERAL (<literal-value>))|(SEQUENCE (<sequence-value>)))

<literal-value> :=  # any string or numerical value

<sequence-value> := ...  # not defined yet

<unique-key> :=  
	ID (<entity-name>)
	HAS (<column-id>{1,})

<foreign-key> :=  
	ID (<entity-name>)
	HAS (<column-id>{1,})
	SOURCE TABLE (<table-name>)
	SOURCE COLS (<column-id>{1,})

<sequence> := ...  # not defined yet

<view> := ...  # not defined yet

<procedure> := ...  # not defined yet

<trigger> := ...  # not defined yet

<select> := SELECT
	INTERFACE (<column-declaration>{1,})
	FROM (<select-from>)  # does not select from Views, only tables and literals

<column-declaration> := 
	ID (<column-id>) 
	TYPE (<data-type>)

<select-from> := (<literal-row>|<source-union>|<source-table>|<source-join>)

<literal-row> := LITERAL ((<column-id> IS <literal-value>){1,})

<source-union> := UNION (<select-from>{1,})  # members are selects with same interface

<source-table> := TABLE 
	ID (<table-id>)
	IMPLEMENTATION ((<column-declaration> IS <fomula-node>){1,})
	[WHERE (<formula-node>)]  # formula-node must return a boolean value
	[GROUP (<column-declaration>{1,})]  # to expand with formulas
	[ORDER (<column-declaration>{1,})]  # to expand with formulas

<formula-node> := ((LITERAL <literal-value>)|(COLUMN <column-declaration>)|<formula>)

<formula> :=
	TYPE (<formula-type>)
	[ARGS (<formula-node>{1,})]  # required when arg-count is greater than zero

<formula-type> := 
	NAME (<formula-name>) 
	RETURNS (<data-type>)
	[ARG COUNT (<arg-count>)]

<formula-name> := (if|switch|and|or|add|mult|concat|substr|to_date|to_str|...)

<arg-count> := ...  # an integer; if not given, has default of infinity

<source-join> := JOIN
	SOURCE ((<alias-id> IS <table-id>){1,})  # to expand with sub-selects
	RELATION (<join-relation>{0,})  # refers to alias-id in SOURCE
	IMPLEMENTATION ((<column-declaration> IS <fomula-node>){1,})  # col ids are for aliases
	[WHERE (<formula-node>)]  # formula-node must return a boolean value
	[GROUP (<column-declaration>{1,})]  # to expand with formulas
	[ORDER (<column-declaration>{1,})]  # to expand with formulas

<alias-id> := <entity-id>

<join-relation> := RELATION
	TYPE (equal|left)
	LHS TABLE (<alias-id>)
	LHS COLUMN (<column-id>)  # to adjust to work with alias-specific column-ids
	LHS TABLE (<alias-id>)
	LHS COLUMN (<column-id>)  # to adjust to work with alias-specific column-ids

A BASIC TABLE STRUCTURE FOR STORING ROSETTA SCHEMAS

This stuff is an older draft of the previous section, in a way.

data_type
	data_type (string)
	base_type (eg: boolean, int, float, datetime, str, binary)
	size (in bytes for most types, in chars for strs)
	store_fixed (boolean, true like 'char', false like 'varchar')

calc_type (used in both select column definitions and where clauses)
	calc_type (means 'function name'; eg: sum, concat, and, or, ifnull, switch/choose/decode)
	data_type -> data_type (for function output)
	arg_count (int; number of function inputs; null means open-ended, like for 'concat')

matrix (interface)
	matrix_id
	is_table (means 'is named', 'is stored in rdbms', 'has constraints', 'is not select or view')
	is_view (means 'is named', 'is actually or conceptually stored in rdbms','is join or union')
	is_union (means 'each column from one or more sources', 'each row from exactly one source')
	is_hierarchy (like a union, rows exactly one source, related by n-levels of self-relations)
	is_join (means 'each column from exactly one source', 'each row from one or more sources')
	is_unique (means 'is distinct' or 'group by all cols' or 'no two rows ident for every col')
	seq_num (if necessary)

matrix_col (interface)
	matrix_col_id
	matrix_id -> matrix
	col_name
	data_type -> data_type
	default_val (null by default, stored on unspec insert, ret in view when col not 'impemented')
	seq_num (if necessary)

schema
	schema_name

matrix_stored (used when 'is table' or 'is view')
	matrix_id -> matrix
	schema_name -> schema
	matrix_name (either table name or view name or some temporary unique thing)

matrix_stored_col (used when 'is table')
	matrix_col_id -> matrix_col
	is_req (means 'is not null')

matrix_union (used when 'is union')
	matrix_id -> matrix (output/parent)
	source_id -> matrix (input/child)
	seq_num (if necessary)

matrix_hierarchy (used when 'is hierarchy'; may need split if multi cols in relation)
	matrix_id -> matrix (output/parent)
	self_col_id -> matrix_col (eg: the primary key)
	parent_col_id -> matrix_col (eg: the primary key of the parent record)

matrix_join_src (used when 'is join')
	matrix_id -> matrix (output/parent)
	source_alias (name to use in 'from matrix_name as alias_name'
	source_id -> matrix (input/child)
	seq_num (if necessary)

matrix_join_rel (used when 'is join' and more than one matrix_join_src)
	matrix_id -> matrix (output/parent)
	is_equal_join (means 'is not left join' and 'is not outer join')
	is_left_join (means 'is not equal join' or 'is outer join?')
	lhs_src_alias -> matrix_join_src (all rows are returned on left join)
	rhs_src_alias -> matrix_join_src (rows may be missing on left join)

matrix_calc_node (used when not 'is table')
	calc_id
	matrix_id -> matrix (used by node tree that is in)
	calc_type -> calc_type (says ret data type, leaf or not, or function vs col vs literal)
	parent_calc_id -> matrix_calc_node (null if self is a root node, set if self is arg)
	source_alias_name -> matrix_join_src (set if leaf, retval from col and not literal)
	source_col_id -> matrix_col (set if leaf, retval from col and not literal)
	literal_value (set if leaf, retval is literal and not col)

matrix_view_col (used when not 'is table')
	matrix_col_id -> matrix_col (used in)
	matrix_calc -> matrix_calc_node (root node of column calculation tree)

matrix_where (used when not 'is table')
	matrix_id -> matrix (used in)
	matrix_calc -> matrix_calc_node (root node of where-clause calc tree; must return boolean)

ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING THAT

This stuff is an older draft of the previous section, in a way.

schema
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary

table
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
	fkeys
		fk_schema - table=schema; cols=schema_name

table_col
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_col - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		data_type - type=entitynm; req=1
		is_req - type=boolean
		default_val - type=generic
		auto_inc - type=boolean
	fkeys
		fk_table - table=table; cols=schema_name,table_name
		fk_data_type - table=data_type; cols=data_type 

table_ukey
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		ukey_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
	fkeys
		fk_table - table=table; cols=schema_name,table_name

table_ukey_col
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		ukey_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_col - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
	fkeys
		fk_table_ukey - table=table_ukey; cols=schema_name,table_name,ukey_name
		fk_table_col - table=table_col; cols=schema_name,table_name,table_col

table_fkey
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		fkey_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		f_schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1
		f_table_name - type=entitynm; req=1
	fkeys
		fk_table - table=table; cols=schema_name,table_name
		fk_f_table - table=table; cols=f_schema_name(schema_name),f_table_name(table_name)

table_fkey_col
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		fkey_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		table_col - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		f_schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1
		f_table_name - type=entitynm; req=1
		f_table_col - type=entitynm; req=1
	fkeys
		fk_table_fkey - table=table_fkey; cols=schema_name,table_name,fkey_name
		fk_table_col - table=table_col; cols=schema_name,table_name,table_col
		fk_f_table_col - table=table_col; cols=f_schema_name(schema_name),f_table_name(table_name),f_table_col(table_col)

view - represents one select statement (main or sub) or stored view
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		view_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		join_type - type=boolean
		union_type - type=boolean
	fkeys
		fk_schema - table=schema; cols=schema_name
		fk_join_type - table=join_type; cols=join_type
		fk_union_type - table=union_type; cols=union_type

view_col - desc column set of result; in case of unions, describes output of all source subselects or tables
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		view_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		view_col - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
	fkeys
		fk_view - table=view; cols=schema_name,view_name

view_src - for subselects or tables in joins or unions or where_condition
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		view_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		src_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		s_schema_name - type=entitynm
		s_table_name - type=entitynm
		s_view_name - type=entitynm
	fkeys
		fk_view - table=view; cols=schema_name,view_name
		fk_s_table - table=table; cols=s_schema_name(schema_name),s_table_name(table_name)
		fk_s_view - table=view; cols=s_schema_name(schema_name),s_view_name(view_name)

view_src_col - for subselects or tables in joins or unions or where_condition
	cols
		schema_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		view_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		src_name - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		view_col - type=entitynm; req=1; ukey=primary
		s_schema_name - type=entitynm
		s_table_name - type=entitynm
		s_table_col - type=entitynm
		s_view_name - type=entitynm
		s_view_col - type=entitynm
	fkeys
		fk_view_src - table=view_src; cols=schema_name,view_name,src_name
		fk_view_col - table=view_col; cols=schema_name,view_name,view_col
		fk_s_table_col - table=table_col; cols=s_schema_name(schema_name),s_table_name(table_name),s_table_col(table_col)
		fk_s_view_col - table=view_col; cols=s_schema_name(schema_name),s_view_name(view_name),s_view_col(view_col)

view_col_def
	cols
		col_def_id - type=int; req=1; ukey=primary; default=1; auto_inc=1
		calc_type - type=entitynm; req=1 - eg: am scalar value or am view column or am func with args; data_type of output
		parent_col_def_id - type=int - set if am arg for another view_col_def which is a func; am not root
		def_schema_name - type=entitynm - set if am not an arg for a view_col_def; am root
		def_view_name - type=entitynm - set if am not an arg for a view_col_def; am root
		def_view_col - type=entitynm - set if am not an arg for a view_col_def; am root
		col_schema_name - type=entitynm - opt 1 for here-value
		col_view_name - type=entitynm - opt 1 for here-value
		col_src_name - type=entitynm - opt 1 for here-value
		literal_value - type=generic - opt 2 for here-value
	fkeys
		fk_calc_type - table=calc_type; cols=calc_type
		fk_parent - table=view_col_def; cols=parent_col_def_id(col_def_id)
		fk_def_view_col - table=view_col; cols=def_schema_name(schema_name),def_view_name(view_name),def_view_col(view_col)
		fk_def_view_col - table=view_src_col; cols=col_schema_name(schema_name),col_view_name(view_name),col_src_name(src_name)

view_join_def - not needed for unions; used with joins

view_filter_def - not needed for unions (subquery does it); used with joins

view_grouping_def - not needed for unions (subquery does it); used with joins

view_ordering_def - not needed for unions (subquery does it if necessary); used with joins

... um ... stuff ...

AUTHOR

Copyright (c) 1999-2003, Darren R. Duncan. All rights reserved. This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. However, I do request that this copyright information and credits remain attached to the file. If you modify this module and redistribute a changed version then please attach a note listing the modifications. This module is available "as-is" and the author can not be held accountable for any problems resulting from its use.

I am always interested in knowing how my work helps others, so if you put this module to use in any of your own products or services then I would appreciate (but not require) it if you send me the website url for said product or service, so I know who you are. Also, if you make non-proprietary changes to the module because it doesn't work the way you need, and you are willing to make these freely available, then please send me a copy so that I can roll desirable changes into the main release.

Address comments, suggestions, and bug reports to perl@DarrenDuncan.net.

SEE ALSO

perl(1), Rosetta::SimilarModules, Rosetta, Rosetta::Schema::DataType, Rosetta::Schema::Table, Rosetta::Schema::View.

33 POD Errors

The following errors were encountered while parsing the POD:

Around line 617:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 621:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 628:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 641:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 646:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 652:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 663:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 675:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 681:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 686:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 695:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 714:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 720:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 729:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 734:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 743:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 748:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 754:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 762:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 767:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 812:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 827:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 866:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 876:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 886:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 897:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 921:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 937:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 947:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 956:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 965:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 974:

Expected text after =item, not a number

Around line 979:

Expected text after =item, not a number