NAME

Test::Class::Sugar - Helper syntax for writing Test::Class tests

SYNOPSIS

use Test::Class::Sugar;

testclass exercises Person {
    # Test::Most has been magically included

    startup >> 1 {
        use_ok $test->subject;
    }

    test autonaming {
        is ref($test), 'Test::Person';
    }

    test the naming of parts {
        is $test->current_method, 'test_the_naming_of_parts';
    }

    test multiple assertions >> 2 {
        is ref($test), 'Test::Person';
        is $test->current_method, 'test_multiple_assertions';
    }
}

Test::Class->runtests;

DESCRIPTION

Test::Class::Sugar provides a new syntax for setting up your Test::Class based tests. The idea is that we bundle up all the tedious boilerplate involved in writing a class in favour of getting to the meat of what you're testing. We made warranted assumptions about what you want to do, and we do them for you. So, when you write

testclass exercises Person {
    ...
}

What Perl sees, after Test::Class::Sugar has done it's work is, roughly:

{
    package Test::Person;
    use base qw/Test::Class/;
    use strict; use warnings;
    require Person;

    sub subject { 'Person' };

    ...
}

Some of the assumptions we made are overrideable, others aren't. Yet. Most of them will be though.

Why you shouldn't use Test::Class::Sugar

Test::Class::Sugar is very new, pretty untested and is indadvertently hostile to you if you confuse it's parser. Don't use it if you want to live.

Why you should use Test::Class::Sugar

But it's so shiny. Test::Class::Sugar was written to scratch an itch I had when writing some tests for a MooseX::Declare based module. Switching from the implementation code to the test code was like shifting from fifth to first gear in one fell swoop. Not fun. This is my attempt to sprinkle some Devel::Declare magic dust over the testing experience.

Bear this in mind

Test::Class::Sugar is not a source filter

I know it looks like a source filter in the right light, but it isn't. Source filters fall down because only perl can parse Perl, so it's easy to confuse them. Devel::Declare based modules work by letting perl parse Perl until it comes across a new keyword, at which point it temporarily hands parsing duty over to a new parser which has the job of parsing the little language introduced by the keyword, turning it into real Perl, and handing the responsibility for parsing that back to Perl. Obviously, it's still possible for that to screw things up royally, but there are fewer opportunities to fuck up.

We now return you to your regularly schedule documentation.

SYNTAX

Essentially, Test::Class::Sugar adds some new keywords to perl. Here's what they do, and what they expect.

testclass

testclass NAME?
  ( exercises CLASS
  | extends CLASS (, CLASS)*
  | +?uses HELPER (, HELPER)*
  )*

Where NAME is is an optional test class name - the sort of thing you're used to writing after package. You don't have to name your testclass, but if you don't supply a name, you MUST supply an exercises clause.

exercises CLASS

You can supply at most one exercises clause. This specifies the class under test. We use it to autoname the class if you haven't provided a NAME of your own (the default name of the class would be Test::<CLASS>). Also, if you supply an exercises clause, the class will be autorequired and your test class will have a subject helper method, which will return the name of the class under test.

extends CLASS (, CLASS)*

Sometimes, you don't want to inherit directly from Test::Class. If that's the case, add an extends clause, and your worries will be over. The extends clause supports, but emphatically does not encourage, multiple inheritance. Friends don't let friends do multiple inheritance, but Test::Class::Sugar's not a friend, it's a robot servant which will provide you with more than enough rope.

+?uses HELPER (, HELPER)*

Ah, the glory that is the uses clause. If you don't provide a uses clause, Test::Class::Sugar will assume that you want to use Test::Most as your testing only testing helper library. If you would rather use, say, Test::More then you can do:

testclass ExampleTest uses -More {...}

Hang on, -More, what's that about? It's a simple shortcut. Instead of making you write uses Test::This, Test::That, Test::TheOther, you can write uses -This, -That, -TheOther and we'll expand the - into Test:: and do the right thing.

If, like me, you like Test::Most, but you want to use some other helper modules, then you'd do:

testclass AnotherExample +uses -MockObject, Moose {...}

+uses extends the list of helper classes, so as well as autousing Test::Most, you'll get Test::MockObject and Moose.

Note that, if you need to do anything special in the way of import arguments, you should do the use yourself. We're all about the 80:20 rule here.

test

test WORD ( WORD )* (>> PLAN) { ... }

I may be fooling myself, but I hope its obvious what this does. Here's a few examples to show you what's happening:

test with multiple subtests >> 3 {...}
test with no_plan >> no_plan {...}
test 'a complicated description with "symbols" in it' {...}

Gets translated to:

sub test_with_multiple_subtests : Test(3) {...}
sub test_with_no_plan : Test(no_plan) {...}
sub a_complicated_description_with_symbols_in_it : Test {...}

See "Test) for details of PLAN's semantics." in Test::Class

startup, setup, teardown, shutdown

These lifecycle helpers work in pretty much the same way as "test", but with the added wrinkle that, if you don't supply a name, they generate method names derived from the name of the test class and the name of the helper, so, for instance:

testclass Test::Lifecycle::Autonaming {
    setup { ... }
}

is equivalent to writing:

testclass Test::Lifecycle::Autonaming {
    setup 'setup_Test_Lifecycle_Autonaming' {...}
}

Other than that, the lifecycle helpers behave pretty much as described in Test::Class.

DIAGNOSTICS

Right now, Test::Class::Sugar's diagnostics range from the confusing to the downright misleading. Expect progress on this in the future, tuit supply permitting.

Patches welcome.

BUGS AND LIMITATIONS

Known bugs

Screwy line numbers

Test::Class::Sugar can screw up the accord between the line perl thinks some code is on and the line the code is actually on. This makes debugging test classes harder than it should be. Our error reporting is bad enough already without making things worse.

Unknown bugs

There's bound to be some.

Patches welcome.

Please report any bugs or feature requests to me. It's unlikely you'll get any response if you use http://rt.cpan.org though. Your best course of action is to fork the project http://www.github.com/pdcawley/test-class-sugar, write at least one failing test (Write something in testclass form that should work, but doesn't. If you can arrange for it to fail gracefully, then please do, but if all you do is write something that blows up spectacularly, that's good too. Failing/exploding tests are like manna to a maintenance programmer.

AUTHOR

Piers Cawley <pdcawley@bofh.org.uk>

LICENCE AND COPYRIGHT

Copyright (c) 2009, Piers Cawley <pdcawley@bofh.org.uk>. All rights reserved.

This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. See perlartistic.

DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY

BECAUSE THIS SOFTWARE IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE SOFTWARE, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE SOFTWARE "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE SOFTWARE IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE SOFTWARE PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR, OR CORRECTION.

IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE AS PERMITTED BY THE ABOVE LICENCE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE SOFTWARE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE SOFTWARE TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER SOFTWARE), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

cpanm Test::Class::Sugar

perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Test::Class::Sugar