NAME
Riap::HTTP - Riap over HTTP
VERSION
version 1.1.19
DESCRIPTION
Riap::HTTP is designed to be implemented by API service providers. It allows features like custom URL layout, multiple serialization format, and logging; while depends on HTTP for other features like authentication, encryption (HTTPS), etc. For a more lightweight alternative, look at Riap::Simple.
Server listens to HTTP requests, parses them into Riap requests, executes the Riap requests, and sends the results to clients.
Additional Riap request keys
fmt => STR
Specify output serialization format to use. The format names are decided by the implementation, but server MUST support
json
as the fallback. If unspecified, default in most cases should also bejson
, but server can default to other format, like say HTML or text, for viewing convenience of certain clients like GUI browser. Server should detect appropriate default output format fromAccept
HTTP request header.To find out what serializations are supported, client can perform an
srvinfo
action.Server should fallback to
json
if requested result format is not supported.
Additional actions
Action: srvinfo
Just like info
action, but get information about the server instead. Server MUST at least return the following keys in the result hash.
{
// server's absolute URL
"srvurl": "http://localhost:5000/",
// supported formats
"fmt": ["Console","HTML","JSON","PHPSerialization","YAML","json"],
}
Parsing Riap request from HTTP request
Server can provide defaults for some/all Riap request keys, so client does not need to explicitly set a Riap request key. But server MUST provide a way for client to set any Riap request key.
First, server MUST parse Riap request keys from HTTP X-Riap-*
request headers, e.g. X-Riap-Action
header for setting the action
request key. In addition, the server MUST parse the X-Riap-*-j-
headers for JSON-encoded value (notice the ending -
), e.g.
X-Riap-Args-j-: {"arg1":"val1","arg2":[1,2,3]}
This allows the server to have its own URL scheme, while allowing a way for a common access mechanism.
The server MUST also accept args
from HTTP request body. The server MUST accept at least body of type application/json
, but it can accept other types. The server MUST not interpret application/x-www-form-urlencoded
for this purpose (and interpret it as a normal web form). Server MUST return response 400 if document type is not recognized.
The server can also accept Riap request keys or function arguments using other means. For example, Plack::Middleware::PeriAHS::ParseRequest, from Perl server implementation, allows parsing Riap request keys like uri
from URI path, and args
keys (as well as other Riap request keys, using -riap-*
syntax) from request variables. For example:
http://HOST/api/PKG/SUBPKG/FUN?a1=1&a2:j=[1,%202]
might result in the following Riap request:
{
"uri": '/PKG/SUBPKG/FUN',
"action": 'call',
"args": {"a1":1, "a2":[1,2]},
}
Another example:
http://HOST/api/PKG/FUN?-riap-action=complete_arg_val&-riap-arg=a1&-riap-word=x
will result in the following Riap request:
{
"uri": '/PKG/FUN',
"action": 'complete_arg_val',
"arg": 'a1',
"word": 'x',
}
SPECIFICATION VERSION
1.1
ABSTRACT
This document specifies using HTTP/HTTPS as the transport layer for Riap, or Riap::HTTP for short.
LOGGING
Riap over HTTP also allows a mechanism to pass logging messages during function calls by using HTTP chunked response.
Two additional Riap request keys are recognized for this:
loglevel
An integer number with value either 0 (for none, the default), 1 (for sending fatal messages), 2 (error), 3 (warn), 4 (info), 5 (debug), and 6 (trace). When a value larger than 0 specified, server must return chunked HTTP response and each log message should be sent as a separate chunk, and the result as the last chunk.
marklog
A bool, default to 0. When set to true, server will prepend each log message with "L" (and the result with "R"). Only useful/relevant when turning on loglevel, so clients can parse/separate log message from result.
EXAMPLES
Below are some examples of what is sent and received over the wire. For these examples, the server has the following URL scheme http://example.org/api/<URI>. Server also assume the default values for these Riap request keys so they do not have to be specified by client: v
(1.1), action
(call).
Call a function, passing function arguments via query parameter, unsuccessfully because of missing argument:
--- Request ---
GET /api/Math/multiply2?a=2 HTTP/1.0
Accept: application/json
--- Response ---
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:11:40 GMT
Server: PeriAHS/0.01
Content-Type: application/json
[400,"Missing required argument: b"]
Call the same function, successfully this time. As a variation we pass function arguments through the X-Riap-Args HTTP header:
--- Request ---
GET /api/Math/multiply2 HTTP/1.0
X-Riap-Args-j-: {"a":2,"b":3}
Accept: application/json
--- Response ---
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:11:50 GMT
Server: PeriAHS/0.01
Content-Type: application/json
[200,"OK",6]
FAQ
Why not directly return status from enveloped result as HTTP response status?
Since enveloped result is modeled somewhat closely after HTTP message, especially the status code, it might make sense to use the status code directly as HTTP status. But this means losing the ability to differentiate between the two. We want the client to be able to differentiate whether the 500 (Internal server error) or 404 (Not found) code it is getting is from the HTTP server/proxies/client or from the enveloped result.
Riap/Riap::HTTP vs REST? Which one to choose for my web service?
Riap maps code entities (packages and functions), while REST maps resources (like business entities) to URI's. For example:
# Riap
/User/ # package
/User/list_users # function
/User/create_user # function
# REST (verb + URI)
GET /user # list users
GET /user/123 # get specific user
POST /user # create a new user
PATCH /user/123 # modify user
DELETE /user/123
Riap is more RPC style, and it is more straightforward if you want to export a set of code modules and functions as API. But it also defines standard and extensible "verbs" (actions). It also helps service discoverability and self-description due to the list
action and the rich Rinci metadata. Riap::HTTP can also use custom routing so if you want you can make it use REST style, while still fulfilling request with Riap in the backend. For example, see Serabi in Perl.
SEE ALSO
AUTHOR
Steven Haryanto <stevenharyanto@gmail.com>
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
This software is copyright (c) 2012 by Steven Haryanto.
This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself.