NAME
HTML::Element::Library - HTML::Element convenience functions
SYNOPSIS
use HTML::Element::Library;
use HTML::TreeBuilder;
DESCRIPTION
This method provides API calls for common actions on trees when using HTML::Tree.
METHODS
The test suite contains examples of each of these methods in a file t/$method.t
Positional Querying Methods
$elem->siblings
Return a list of all nodes under the same parent.
$elem->sibdex
Return the index of $elem
into the array of siblings of which it is a part. HTML::ElementSuper calls this method addr
but I don't think that is a descriptive name. And such naming is deceptively close to the address
function of HTML::Element
. HOWEVER, in the interest of backwards compatibility, both methods are available.
$elem->addr
Same as sibdex
$elem->position()
Returns the coordinates of this element in the tree it inhabits. This is accomplished by succesively calling addr() on ancestor elements until either a) an element that does not support these methods is found, or b) there are no more parents. The resulting list is the n-dimensional coordinates of the element in the tree.
Element Decoration Methods
HTML::Element::Library::super_literal($text)
In HTML::Element, Sean Burke discusses super-literals. They are text which does not get escaped. Great for includng Javascript in HTML. Also great for including foreign language into a document.
So, you basically toss super_literal
your text and back comes your text wrapped in a ~literal
element.
One of these days, I'll around to writing a nice EXPORT
section.
Tree Rewriting Methods
"de-prepping" HTML
Oftentimes, the HTML to be worked with will have multiple sample rows:
<OL>
<LI>bread
<LI>butter
<LI>beer
<LI>bacon
</OL>
But, before you begin to rewrite the HTML with your model data, you typically only want 1 or 2 sample rows.
Thus, you want to "crunch" the multiple sample rows to a specified amount. Hence the crunch
method:
$tree->crunch(look_down => [ '_tag' => 'li' ], leave => 2) ;
The leave
argument defaults to 1 if not given. The call above would "crunch" the above 4 sample rows to:
<OL>
<LI>bread
<LI>butter
</OL>
Simplifying calls to HTML::FillInForm
Since HTML::FillInForm gets and returns strings, using HTML::Element instances becomes tedious:
1. Seamstress has an HTML tree that it wants the form filled in on
2. Seamstress converts this tree to a string
3. FillInForm parses the string into an HTML tree and then fills in the form
4. FillInForm converts the HTML tree to a string
5. Seamstress re-parses the HTML for additional processing
I've filed a bug about this: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=44105
This function, fillinform, allows you to pass a tree to fillinform (along with your data structure) and get back a tree:
my $new_tree = $html_tree->fillinform($data_structure);
Mapping a hashref to HTML elements
It is very common to get a hashref of data from some external source - flat file, database, XML, etc. Therefore, it is important to have a convenient way of mapping this data to HTML.
As it turns out, there are 3 ways to do this in HTML::Element::Library. The most strict and structured way to do this is with content_handler
. Two other methods, hashmap
and datamap
require less manual mapping and may prove even more easy to use in certain cases.
As is usual with Perl, a practical example is always best. So let's take some sample HTML:
<h1>user data</h1>
<span id="name">?</span>
<span id="email">?</span>
<span id="gender">?</span>
Now, let's say our data structure is this:
$ref = { email => 'jim@beam.com', gender => 'lots' } ;
And let's start with the most strict way to get what you want:
$tree->content_handler(email => $ref->{email} , gender => $ref->{gender}) ;
In this case, you manually state the mapping between id tags and hashref keys and then content_handler
retrieves the hashref data and pops it in the specified place.
Now let's look at the two (actually 2 and a half) other hash-mapping methods.
$tree->hashmap(id => $ref);
Now, what this function does is super-destructive. It finds every element in the tree with an attribute named id (since 'id' is a parameter, it could find every element with some other attribute also) and replaces the content of those elements with the hashref value.
So, in the case above, the
<span id="name">?</span>
would come out as
<span id="name"></span>
(it would be blank) - because there is nothing in the hash with that value, so it substituted
$ref->{name}
which was blank and emptied the contents.
Now, let's assume we want to protect name from being auto-assigned. Here is what you do:
$tree->hashmap(id => $ref, ['name']);
That last array ref is an exclusion list.
But wouldnt it be nice if you could do a hashmap, but only assigned things which are defined in the hashref? defmap()
to the rescue:
$tree->defmap(id => $ref);
does just that, so
<span id="name">?</span>
would be left alone.
$elem->hashmap($attr_name, \%hashref, \@excluded, $debug)
This method is designed to take a hashref and populate a series of elements. For example:
<table>
<tr sclass="tr" class="alt" align="left" valign="top">
<td smap="people_id">1</td>
<td smap="phone">(877) 255-3239</td>
<td smap="password">*********</td>
</tr>
</table>
In the table above, there are several attributes named smap
. If we have a hashref whose keys are the same:
my %data = (people_id => 888, phone => '444-4444', password => 'dont-you-dare-render');
Then a single API call allows us to populate the HTML while excluding those ones we dont:
$tree->hashmap(smap => \%data, ['password']);
Note: the other way to prevent rendering some of the hash mapping is to not give that element the attr you plan to use for hash mapping.
Also note: the function hashmap
has a simple easy-to-type API. Interally, it calls hash_map
(which has a more verbose keyword calling API). Thus, the above call to hashmap()
results in this call:
$tree->hash_map(hash => \%data, to_attr => 'sid', excluding => ['password']);
$elem->defmap($attr_name, \%hashref, $debug)
defmap
was described above.
$elem->content_handler(%hashref)
content_handler
is described below.
$elem->replace_content(@new_elem)
Replaces all of $elem
's content with @new_elem
.
$elem->wrap_content($wrapper_element)
Wraps the existing content in the provided element. If the provided element happens to be a non-element, a push_content is performed instead.
$elem->set_child_content(@look_down, $content)
This method looks down $tree using the criteria specified in @look_down using the the HTML::Element look_down() method.
After finding the node, it detaches the node's content and pushes $content as the node's content.
$tree->content_handler(%id_content)
This is a convenience method. Because the look_down criteria will often simply be:
id => 'fixme'
to find things like:
<a id=fixme href=http://www.somesite.org>replace_content</a>
You can call this method to shorten your typing a bit. You can simply type
$elem->content_handler( fixme => 'new text' )
Instead of typing:
$elem->set_child_content(sid => 'fixme', 'new text')
ALSO NOTE: you can pass a hash whose keys are id
s and whose values are the content you want there and it will perform the replacement on each hash member:
my %id_content = (name => "Terrence Brannon",
email => 'tbrannon@in.com',
balance => 666,
content => $main_content);
$tree->content_handler(%id_content);
$tree->highlander($subtree_span_id, $conditionals, @conditionals_args)
This allows for "if-then-else" style processing. Highlander was a movie in which only one would survive. Well, in terms of a tree when looking at a structure that you want to process in if-then-else
style, only one child will survive. For example, given this HTML template:
<span klass="highlander" id="age_dialog">
<span id="under10">
Hello, does your mother know you're
using her AOL account?
</span>
<span id="under18">
Sorry, you're not old enough to enter
(and too dumb to lie about your age)
</span>
<span id="welcome">
Welcome
</span>
</span>
We only want one child of the span
tag with id age_dialog
to remain based on the age of the person visiting the page.
So, let's setup a call that will prune the subtree as a function of age:
sub process_page {
my $age = shift;
my $tree = HTML::TreeBuilder->new_from_file('t/html/highlander.html');
$tree->highlander
(age_dialog =>
[
under10 => sub { $_[0] < 10} ,
under18 => sub { $_[0] < 18} ,
welcome => sub { 1 }
],
$age
);
And there we have it. If the age is less than 10, then the node with id under10
remains. For age less than 18, the node with id under18
remains. Otherwise our "else" condition fires and the child with id welcome
remains.
$tree->passover(@id_of_element)
In some cases, you know exactly which element(s) should survive. In this case, you can simply call passover
to remove it's (their) siblings. For the HTML above, you could delete under10
and welcome
by simply calling:
$tree->passover('under18');
Because passover takes an array, you can specify several children to preserve.
$tree->highlander2($tree, $conditionals, @conditionals_args)
Right around the same time that table2()
came into being, Seamstress began to tackle tougher and tougher processing problems. It became clear that a more powerful highlander was needed... one that not only snipped the tree of the nodes that should not survive, but one that allows for post-processing of the survivor node. And one that was more flexible with how to find the nodes to snip.
Thus (drum roll) highlander2()
.
So let's look at our HTML which requires post-selection processing:
<span klass="highlander" id="age_dialog">
<span id="under10">
Hello, little <span id=age>AGE</span>-year old,
does your mother know you're using her AOL account?
</span>
<span id="under18">
Sorry, you're only <span id=age>AGE</span>
(and too dumb to lie about your age)
</span>
<span id="welcome">
Welcome, isn't it good to be <span id=age>AGE</span> years old?
</span>
</span>
In this case, a branch survives, but it has dummy data in it. We must take the surviving segment of HTML and rewrite the age span
with the age. Here is how we use highlander2()
to do so:
sub replace_age {
my $branch = shift;
my $age = shift;
$branch->look_down(id => 'age')->replace_content($age);
}
my $if_then = $tree->look_down(id => 'age_dialog');
$if_then->highlander2(
cond => [
under10 => [
sub { $_[0] < 10} ,
\&replace_age
],
under18 => [
sub { $_[0] < 18} ,
\&replace_age
],
welcome => [
sub { 1 },
\&replace_age
]
],
cond_arg => [ $age ]
);
We pass it the tree ($if_then
), an arrayref of conditions (cond
) and an arrayref of arguments which are passed to the cond
s and to the replacement subs.
The under10
, under18
and welcome
are id attributes in the tree of the siblings of which only one will survive. However, should you need to do more complex look-downs to find the survivor, then supply an array ref instead of a simple scalar:
$if_then->highlander2(
cond => [
[class => 'r12'] => [
sub { $_[0] < 10} ,
\&replace_age
],
[class => 'z22'] => [
sub { $_[0] < 18} ,
\&replace_age
],
[class => 'w88'] => [
sub { 1 },
\&replace_age
]
],
cond_arg => [ $age ]
);
$tree->overwrite_attr($mutation_attr => $mutating_closures)
This method is designed for taking a tree and reworking a set of nodes in a stereotyped fashion. For instance let's say you have 3 remote image archives, but you don't want to put long URLs in your img src tags for reasons of abstraction, re-use and brevity. So instead you do this:
<img src="/img/smiley-face.jpg" fixup="src lnc">
<img src="/img/hot-babe.jpg" fixup="src playboy">
<img src="/img/footer.jpg" fixup="src foobar">
and then when the tree of HTML is being processed, you make this call:
my %closures = (
lnc => sub { my ($tree, $mute_node, $attr_value)= @_; "http://lnc.usc.edu$attr_value" },
playboy => sub { my ($tree, $mute_node, $attr_value)= @_; "http://playboy.com$attr_value" }
foobar => sub { my ($tree, $mute_node, $attr_value)= @_; "http://foobar.info$attr_value" }
)
$tree->overwrite_attr(fixup => \%closures) ;
and the tags come out modified like so:
<img src="http://lnc.usc.edu/img/smiley-face.jpg" fixup="src lnc">
<img src="http://playboy.com/img/hot-babe.jpg" fixup="src playboy">
<img src="http://foobar.info/img/footer.jpg" fixup="src foobar">
$tree->mute_elem($mutation_attr => $mutating_closures, [ $post_hook ] )
This is a generalization of overwrite_attr
. overwrite_attr
assumes the return value of the closure is supposed overwrite an attribute value and does it for you. mute_elem
is a more general function which does nothing but hand the closure the element and let it mutate it as it jolly well pleases :)
In fact, here is the implementation of overwrite_attr
to give you a taste of how mute_attr
is used:
sub overwrite_action {
my ($mute_node, %X) = @_;
$mute_node->attr($X{local_attr}{name} => $X{local_attr}{value}{new});
}
sub HTML::Element::overwrite_attr {
my $tree = shift;
$tree->mute_elem(@_, \&overwrite_action);
}
Tree-Building Methods
Unrolling an array via a single sample element (<ul> container)
This is best described by example. Given this HTML:
<strong>Here are the things I need from the store:</strong>
<ul>
<li class="store_items">Sample item</li>
</ul>
We can unroll it like so:
my $li = $tree->look_down(class => 'store_items');
my @items = qw(bread butter vodka);
$tree->iter($li => @items);
To produce this:
<html>
<head></head>
<body>Here are the things I need from the store:
<ul>
<li class="store_items">bread</li>
<li class="store_items">butter</li>
<li class="store_items">vodka</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
Now, you might be wondering why the API call is:
$tree->iter($li => @items)
instead of:
$li->iter(@items)
and there is no good answer. The latter would be more concise and it is what I should have done.
Unrolling an array via n sample elements (<dl> container)
iter()
was fine for awhile, but some things (e.g. definition lists) need a more general function to make them easy to do. Hence iter2()
. This function will be explained by example of unrolling a simple definition list.
So here's our mock-up HTML from the designer:
<dl class="dual_iter" id="service_plan">
<dt>
Artist
</dt>
<dd>
A person who draws blood.
</dd>
<dt>
Musician
</dt>
<dd>
A clone of Iggy Pop.
</dd>
<dt>
Poet
</dt>
<dd>
A relative of Edgar Allan Poe.
</dd>
<dt class="adstyle">sample header</dt>
<dd class="adstyle2">sample data</dd>
</dl>
And we want to unroll our data set:
my @items = (
['the pros' => 'never have to worry about service again'],
['the cons' => 'upfront extra charge on purchase'],
['our choice' => 'go with the extended service plan']
);
Now, let's make this problem a bit harder to show off the power of iter2()
. Let's assume that we want only the last <dt> and it's accompanying <dd> (the one with "sample data") to be used as the sample data for unrolling with our data set. Let's further assume that we want them to remain in the final output.
So now, the API to iter2()
will be discussed and we will explain how our goal of getting our data into HTML fits into the API.
wrapper_ld
This is how to look down and find the container of all the elements we will be unrolling. The <dl> tag is the container for the dt and dd tags we will be unrolling.
If you pass an anonymous subroutine, then it is presumed that execution of this subroutine will return the HTML::Element representing the container tag. If you pass an array ref, then this will be dereferenced and passed to
HTML::Element::look_down()
.default value:
['_tag' => 'dl']
Based on the mock HTML above, this default is fine for finding our container tag. So let's move on.
wrapper_data
This is an array reference of data that we will be putting into the container. You must supply this.
@items
above is ourwrapper_data
.wrapper_proc
After we find the container via
wrapper_ld
, we may want to pre-process some aspect of this tree. In our case the first two sets of dt and dd need to be removed, leaving the last dt and dd. So, we supply awrapper_proc
which will do this.default: undef
item_ld
This anonymous subroutine returns an array ref of
HTML::Element
s that will be cloned and populated with item data (item data is a "row" ofwrapper_data
).default: returns an arrayref consisting of the dt and dd element inside the container.
item_data
This is a subroutine that takes
wrapper_data
and retrieves one "row" to be "pasted" into the array ref ofHTML::Element
s found viaitem_ld
. I hope that makes sense.default: shifts
wrapper_data
.item_proc
This is a subroutine that takes the
item_data
and theHTML::Element
s found viaitem_ld
and produces an arrayref ofHTML::Element
s which will eventually be spliced into the container.Note that this subroutine MUST return the new items. This is done So that more items than were passed in can be returned. This is useful when, for example, you must return 2 dts for an input data item. And when would you do this? When a single term has multiple spellings for instance.
default: expects
item_data
to be an arrayref of two elements anditem_elems
to be an arrayref of twoHTML::Element
s. It replaces the content of theHTML::Element
s with theitem_data
.splice
After building up an array of
@item_elems
, the subroutine passed assplice
will be given the parent container HTML::Element and the@item_elems
. How the@item_elems
end up in the container is up to this routine: it could put half of them in. It could unshift them or whatever.default:
$container->splice_content(0, 2, @item_elems)
In other words, kill the 2 sample elements with the newly generated @item_elems
So now that we have documented the API, let's see the call we need:
$tree->iter2(
# default wrapper_ld ok.
wrapper_data => \@items,
wrapper_proc => sub {
my ($container) = @_;
# only keep the last 2 dts and dds
my @content_list = $container->content_list;
$container->splice_content(0, @content_list - 2);
},
# default item_ld is fine.
# default item_data is fine.
# default item_proc is fine.
splice => sub {
my ($container, @item_elems) = @_;
$container->unshift_content(@item_elems);
},
debug => 1,
);
Select Unrolling
The unroll_select
method has this API:
$tree->unroll_select(
select_label => $id_label,
option_value => $closure, # how to get option value from data row
option_content => $closure, # how to get option content from data row
option_selected => $closure, # boolean to decide if SELECTED
data => $data # the data to be put into the SELECT
data_iter => $closure # the thing that will get a row of data
debug => $boolean,
append => $boolean, # remove the sample <OPTION> data or append?
);
Here's an example:
$tree->unroll_select(
select_label => 'clan_list',
option_value => sub { my $row = shift; $row->clan_id },
option_content => sub { my $row = shift; $row->clan_name },
option_selected => sub { my $row = shift; $row->selected },
data => \@query_results,
data_iter => sub { my $data = shift; $data->next },
append => 0,
debug => 0
);
Tree-Building Methods: Table Generation
Matthew Sisk has a much more intuitive (imperative) way to generate tables via his module HTML::ElementTable. However, for those with callback fever, the following method is available. First, we look at a nuts and bolts way to build a table using only standard HTML::Tree API calls. Then the table
method available here is discussed.
Sample Model
package Simple::Class;
use Set::Array;
my @name = qw(bob bill brian babette bobo bix);
my @age = qw(99 12 44 52 12 43);
my @weight = qw(99 52 80 124 120 230);
sub new {
my $this = shift;
bless {}, ref($this) || $this;
}
sub load_data {
my @data;
for (0 .. 5) {
push @data, {
age => $age[rand $#age] + int rand 20,
name => shift @name,
weight => $weight[rand $#weight] + int rand 40
}
}
Set::Array->new(@data);
}
1;
Sample Usage:
my $data = Simple::Class->load_data;
++$_->{age} for @$data
Inline Code to Unroll a Table
HTML
<html>
<table id="load_data">
<tr> <th>name</th><th>age</th><th>weight</th> </tr>
<tr id="iterate">
<td id="name"> NATURE BOY RIC FLAIR </td>
<td id="age"> 35 </td>
<td id="weight"> 220 </td>
</tr>
</table>
</html>
The manual way (*NOT* recommended)
require 'simple-class.pl';
use HTML::Seamstress;
# load the view
my $seamstress = HTML::Seamstress->new_from_file('simple.html');
# load the model
my $o = Simple::Class->new;
my $data = $o->load_data;
# find the <table> and <tr>
my $table_node = $seamstress->look_down('id', 'load_data');
my $iter_node = $table_node->look_down('id', 'iterate');
my $table_parent = $table_node->parent;
# drop the sample <table> and <tr> from the HTML
# only add them in if there is data in the model
# this is achieved via the $add_table flag
$table_node->detach;
$iter_node->detach;
my $add_table;
# Get a row of model data
while (my $row = shift @$data) {
# We got row data. Set the flag indicating ok to hook the table into the HTML
++$add_table;
# clone the sample <tr>
my $new_iter_node = $iter_node->clone;
# find the tags labeled name age and weight and
# set their content to the row data
$new_iter_node->content_handler($_ => $row->{$_})
for qw(name age weight);
$table_node->push_content($new_iter_node);
}
# reattach the table to the HTML tree if we loaded data into some table rows
$table_parent->push_content($table_node) if $add_table;
print $seamstress->as_HTML;
$tree->table() : API call to Unroll a Table
require 'simple-class.pl';
use HTML::Seamstress;
# load the view
my $seamstress = HTML::Seamstress->new_from_file('simple.html');
# load the model
my $o = Simple::Class->new;
$seamstress->table
(
# tell seamstress where to find the table, via the method call
# ->look_down('id', $gi_table). Seamstress detaches the table from the
# HTML tree automatically if no table rows can be built
gi_table => 'load_data',
# tell seamstress where to find the tr. This is a bit useless as
# the <tr> usually can be found as the first child of the parent
gi_tr => 'iterate',
# the model data to be pushed into the table
table_data => $o->load_data,
# the way to take the model data and obtain one row
# if the table data were a hashref, we would do:
# my $key = (keys %$data)[0]; my $val = $data->{$key}; delete $data->{$key}
tr_data => sub { my ($self, $data) = @_;
shift(@{$data}) ;
},
# the way to take a row of data and fill the <td> tags
td_data => sub { my ($tr_node, $tr_data) = @_;
$tr_node->content_handler($_ => $tr_data->{$_})
for qw(name age weight) }
);
print $seamstress->as_HTML;
Looping over Multiple Sample Rows
* HTML
<html>
<table id="load_data" CELLPADDING=8 BORDER=2>
<tr> <th>name</th><th>age</th><th>weight</th> </tr>
<tr id="iterate1" BGCOLOR="white" >
<td id="name"> NATURE BOY RIC FLAIR </td>
<td id="age"> 35 </td>
<td id="weight"> 220 </td>
</tr>
<tr id="iterate2" BGCOLOR="#CCCC99">
<td id="name"> NATURE BOY RIC FLAIR </td>
<td id="age"> 35 </td>
<td id="weight"> 220 </td>
</tr>
</table>
</html>
* Only one change to last API call.
This:
gi_tr => 'iterate',
becomes this:
gi_tr => ['iterate1', 'iterate2']
$tree->table2() : New API Call to Unroll a Table
After 2 or 3 years with table()
, I began to develop production websites with it and decided it needed a cleaner interface, particularly in the area of handling the fact that id
tags will be the same after cloning a table row.
First, I will give a dry listing of the function's argument parameters. This will not be educational most likely. A better way to understand how to use the function is to read through the incremental unrolling of the function's interface given in conversational style after the dry listing. But take your pick. It's the same information given in two different ways.
Dry/technical parameter documentation
$tree->table2(%param)
takes the following arguments:
table_ld => $look_down
: optionalHow to find the
table
element in$tree
. If$look_down
is an arrayref, then uselook_down
. If it is a CODE ref, then call it, passing it$tree
.Defaults to
['_tag' => 'table']
if not passed in.table_data => $tabular_data
: requiredThe data to fill the table with. Must be passed in.
table_proc => $code_ref
: not implementedA subroutine to do something to the table once it is found. Not currently implemented. Not obviously necessary. Just created because there is a
tr_proc
andtd_proc
.tr_ld => $look_down
: optionalSame as
table_ld
but for finding the table row elements. Please note that thetr_ld
is done on the table node that was found instead of the whole HTML tree. This makes sense. Thetr
s that you want exist below the table that was just found.Defaults to
['_tag' => 'tr']
if not passed in.tr_data => $code_ref
: optionalHow to take the
table_data
and return a row. Defaults to:sub { my ($self, $data) = @_; shift(@{$data}) ; }
tr_proc => $code_ref
: optionalSomething to do to the table row we are about to add to the table we are making. Defaults to a routine which makes the
id
attribute unique:sub { my ($self, $tr, $tr_data, $tr_base_id, $row_count) = @_; $tr->attr(id => sprintf "%s_%d", $tr_base_id, $row_count); }
td_proc => $code_ref
: requiredThis coderef will take the row of data and operate on the
td
cells that are children of thetr
. Seet/table2.t
for several usage examples.Here's a sample one:
sub { my ($tr, $data) = @_; my @td = $tr->look_down('_tag' => 'td'); for my $i (0..$#td) { $td[$i]->splice_content(0, 1, $data->[$i]); } }
Conversational parameter documentation
The first thing you need is a table. So we need a look down for that. If you don't give one, it defaults to
['_tag' => 'table']
What good is a table to display in without data to display?! So you must supply a scalar representing your tabular data source. This scalar might be an array reference, a next
able iterator, a DBI statement handle. Whatever it is, it can be iterated through to build up rows of table data. These two required fields (the way to find the table and the data to display in the table) are table_ld
and table_data
respectively. A little more on table_ld
. If this happens to be a CODE ref, then execution of the code ref is presumed to return the HTML::Element
representing the table in the HTML tree.
Next, we get the row or rows which serve as sample tr
elements by doing a look_down
from the table_elem
. While normally one sample row is enough to unroll a table, consider when you have alternating table rows. This API call would need one of each row so that it can cycle through the sample rows as it loops through the data. Alternatively, you could always just use one row and make the necessary changes to the single tr
row by mutating the element in tr_proc
, discussed below. The default tr_ld
is ['_tag' => 'tr']
but you can overwrite it. Note well, if you overwrite it with a subroutine, then it is expected that the subroutine will return the HTML::Element
(s) which are tr
element(s). The reason a subroutine might be preferred is in the case that the HTML designers gave you 8 sample tr
rows but only one prototype row is needed. So you can write a subroutine, to splice out the 7 rows you don't need and leave the one sample row remaining so that this API call can clone it and supply it to the tr_proc
and td_proc
calls.
Now, as we move through the table rows with table data, we need to do two different things on each table row:
get one row of data from the
table_data
viatr_data
The default procedure assumes the
table_data
is an array reference and shifts a row off of it:sub { my ($self, $data) = @_; shift(@{$data}) ; }
Your function MUST return undef when there is no more rows to lay out.
take the
tr
element and mutate it viatr_proc
The default procedure simply makes the id of the table row unique:
sub { my ($self, $tr, $tr_data, $row_count, $root_id) = @_; $tr->attr(id => sprintf "%s_%d", $root_id, $row_count); }
Now that we have our row of data, we call td_proc
so that it can take the data and the td
cells in this tr
and process them. This function must be supplied.
Whither a Table with No Rows
Often when a table has no rows, we want to display a message indicating this to the view. Use conditional processing to decide what to display:
<span id=no_data>
<table><tr><td>No Data is Good Data</td></tr></table>
</span>
<span id=load_data>
<html>
<table id="load_data">
<tr> <th>name</th><th>age</th><th>weight</th> </tr>
<tr id="iterate">
<td id="name"> NATURE BOY RIC FLAIR </td>
<td id="age"> 35 </td>
<td id="weight"> 220 </td>
</tr>
</table>
</html>
</span>
Tree-Killing Methods
$tree->prune
This removes any nodes from the tree which consist of nothing or nothing but whitespace. See also delete_ignorable_whitespace in HTML::Element.
Loltree Functions
A loltree is an arrayref consisting of arrayrefs which is used by new_from__lol
in HTML::Element to produce HTML trees. The CPAN distro XML::Element::Tolol creates such XML trees by parsing XML files, analagous to XML::Toolkit. The purpose of the functions in this section is to allow you manipulate a loltree programmatically.
These could not be methods because if you bless a loltree, then HTML::Tree will barf.
HTML::Element::newchild($lol, $parent_label, @newchild)
Given this initial loltree:
my $initial_lol = [ note => [ shopping => [ item => 'sample' ] ] ];
This code:
sub shopping_items {
my @shopping_items = map { [ item => _ ] } qw(bread butter beans) ;
@shopping_items;
}
my $new_lol = HTML::Element::newnode($initial_lol, item => shopping_items());
will replace the single sample with a list of shopping items:
[
'note',
[
'shopping',
[
'item',
'bread'
],
[
'item',
'butter'
],
[
'item',
'beans'
]
]
];
Thanks to kcott and the other Perlmonks in this thread: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=912416
SEE ALSO
HTML::Tree
A perl package for creating and manipulating HTML trees.
HTML::ElementTable
An HTML::Tree - based module which allows for manipulation of HTML trees using cartesian coordinations.
HTML::Seamstress
An HTML::Tree - based module inspired by XMLC (http://xmlc.enhydra.org), allowing for dynamic HTML generation via tree rewriting.
Push-style templating systems
A comprehensive cross-language list of push-style templating systems.
TODO
highlander2
currently the API expects the subtrees to survive or be pruned to be identified by id:
$if_then->highlander2([ under10 => sub { $_[0] < 10} , under18 => sub { $_[0] < 18} , welcome => [ sub { 1 }, sub { my $branch = shift; $branch->look_down(id => 'age')->replace_content($age); } ] ], $age );
but, it should be more flexible. the
under10
, andunder18
are expected to be ids in the tree... but it is not hard to have a check to see if this field is an array reference and if it, then to do a look down instead:$if_then->highlander2([ [class => 'under10'] => sub { $_[0] < 10} , [class => 'under18'] => sub { $_[0] < 18} , [class => 'welcome'] => [ sub { 1 }, sub { my $branch = shift; $branch->look_down(id => 'age')->replace_content($age); } ] ], $age );
AUTHOR and ACKS
Terrence Brannon, <tbone@cpan.org>
I appreciate the feedback from M. David Moussa Leo Keita regarding some issues with the test suite, namely (1) CRLF leading to test breakage in t/crunch.t and (2) using the wrong module in t/prune.t thus not having the right functionality available.
Many thanks to BARBIE for his RT bug report.
Many thanks to perlmonk kcott for his work on array rewriting: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=912416. It was crucial in the development of newchild.
Source Repo
The source is at http://github.com/metaperl/html-element-library/tree/master
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
Copyright (C) 2004 by Terrence Brannon
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself, either Perl version 5.8.4 or, at your option, any later version of Perl 5 you may have available.
2 POD Errors
The following errors were encountered while parsing the POD:
- Around line 988:
You forgot a '=back' before '=head4'
- Around line 1222:
You forgot a '=back' before '=head1'